RFC 6165 PROPOSED STANDARD IS-IS · LAYER 2 · BRIDGING

Extensions to IS-IS for Layer-2 Systems

Two IS-IS TLVs that let a link state protocol carry Layer-2 MAC addresses.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
April 2011
AUTHORS
A. Banerjee, D. Ward
STREAM
IETF
MT-PORT-CAP TLV
IS-IS TLV type 143, carried in Hello PDUs
MAC-RI TLV
IS-IS TLV type 147, carried in Link State PDUs
MAC-RI VALUE LENGTH
5 plus 6 times the number of MAC addresses, in bytes
TOPOLOGY IDENTIFIER FIELD
12 bits, and zero means base topology information
VLAN IDENTIFIER FIELD
12 bits, and zero means no VLAN is specified
MAC ADDRESSES CARRIED
48 bits each, and only unicast addresses are allowed
DOI
10.17487/RFC6165

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       A. Banerjee
Request for Comments: 6165                                 Cisco Systems
Category: Standards Track                                        D. Ward
ISSN: 2070-1721                                         Juniper Networks
                                                              April 2011


                Extensions to IS-IS for Layer-2 Systems

Abstract

   This document specifies the Intermediate System to Intermediate
   System (IS-IS) extensions necessary to support link state routing for
   any protocols running directly over Layer-2.  While supporting this
   concept involves several pieces, this document only describes
   extensions to IS-IS.  Furthermore, the Type, Length, Value pairs
   (TLVs) described in this document are generic Layer-2 additions, and
   specific ones as needed are defined in the IS-IS technology-specific
   extensions.  We leave it to the systems using these IS-IS extensions
   to explain how the information carried in IS-IS is used.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6165.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1. Overview ........................................................2
      1.1. Terminology ................................................3
   2. TLV Enhancements to IS-IS .......................................3
      2.1. Multi-Topology-Aware Port Capability TLV ...................3
      2.2. The MAC-Reachability TLV ...................................4
   3. Acknowledgements ................................................5
   4. Security Considerations .........................................5
   5. IANA Considerations .............................................5
   6. References ......................................................6
      6.1. Normative References .......................................6
      6.2. Informative References .....................................6

1.  Overview

   There are a number of systems (for example, [RBRIDGES], [802.1aq],
   and [OTV]) that use Layer-2 addresses carried in a link state routing
   protocol, specifically Intermediate System to Intermediate System
   [IS-IS] [RFC1195], to provide true Layer-2 routing.  In almost all
   the technologies mentioned above, classical Layer-2 packets are
   encapsulated with an outer header.  The outer header format varies
   across all these technologies.  This outer header is used to route
   the encapsulated packets to their destination.

   Each Intermediate System (IS) advertises one or more IS-IS Link State
   Protocol Data Units (PDUs) with routing information.  Each Link State
   PDU (LSP) is composed of a fixed header and a number of tuples, each
   consisting of a Type, a Length, and a Value.  Such tuples are
   commonly known as TLVs.  In this document, we specify a set of TLVs
   to be added to [IS-IS] PDUs, to support these proposed systems.  The
   TLVs are generic Layer-2 additions, and specific ones, as needed, are
   defined in the IS-IS technology-specific extensions.  This document
   does not propose any new forwarding mechanisms using this additional
   information carried within IS-IS.

1.1.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

2.  TLV Enhancements to IS-IS

   This section specifies the enhancements for the TLVs that are needed
   in common by Layer-2 technologies.

2.1.  Multi-Topology-Aware Port Capability TLV

   The Multi-Topology-aware Port Capability (MT-PORT-CAP) is IS-IS TLV
   type 143 and has the following format:

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Type=MTPORTCAP|                  (1 byte)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Length      |                  (1 byte)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |R|R|R|R|  Topology Identifier  |  (2 bytes)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                sub-TLVs         (variable bytes)              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   o  Type: TLV Type, set to MT-PORT-CAP TLV 143.

   o  Length: Total number of bytes contained in the value field,
      including the length of the sub-TLVs carried in this TLV.

   o  R: Reserved 4 bits, MUST be sent as zero and ignored on receipt.

   o  Topology Identifier: MT ID is a 12-bit field containing the MT ID
      of the topology being announced.  This field when set to zero
      implies that it is being used to carry base topology information.

   o  Sub-TLVs: The MT-PORT-CAP TLV value contains sub-TLVs formatted as
      described in [RFC5305].  They are defined in the technology-
      specific documents.

   The MT-PORT-CAP TLV may occur multiple times and is carried within an
   IS-IS Hello (IIH) PDU.

2.2.  The MAC-Reachability TLV

   The MAC-Reachability (MAC-RI) TLV is IS-IS TLV type 147 and has the
   following format:

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Type= MAC-RI  |                  (1 byte)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Length      |                  (1 byte)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Topology-id/Nickname        |  (2 bytes)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Confidence  |                  (1 byte)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  RESV |      VLAN-ID          |  (2 bytes)
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          MAC (1)       (6 bytes)                 |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                      .................                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          MAC (N)       (6 bytes)                 |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   o  Type: TLV Type, set to 147 (MAC-RI).

   o  Length: Total number of bytes contained in the value field given
      by 5 + 6*n bytes.

   o  Topology-id/Nickname : Depending on the technology in which it is
      used, this carries the topology-id or nickname.  When this field
      is set to zero, this implies that the Media Access Control (MAC)
      addresses are reachable across all topologies or across all
      nicknames of the originating IS.

   o  Confidence: This carries an 8-bit quantity indicating the
      confidence level in the MAC addresses being transported.  Whether
      this field is used, and its semantics if used, are further defined
      by the specific protocol using Layer-2 IS-IS.  If not used, it
      MUST be set to zero on transmission and be ignored on receipt.

   o  RESV: (4 bits) MUST be sent as zero and ignored on receipt.

   o  VLAN-ID: This carries a 12-bit VLAN identifier that is valid for
      all subsequent MAC addresses in this TLV, or the value zero if no
      VLAN is specified.

   o  MAC(i): This is the 48-bit MAC address reachable from the IS that
      is announcing this TLV.

   The MAC-RI TLV is carried in a standard Link State PDU (LSP).  This
   TLV can be carried multiple times in an LSP and in multiple LSPs.  It
   MUST contain only unicast addresses.  The manner in which these TLVs
   are generated by the various Layer-2 routing technologies and the
   manner in which they are consumed are detailed in the technology-
   specific documents.

   In most of the technologies, these MAC-RI TLVs will translate to
   populating the hardware with these entries and with appropriate next-
   hop information as derived from the advertising IS.

3.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank Peter Ashwood-Smith, Donald E.
   Eastlake 3rd, Dino Farinacci, Don Fedyk, Les Ginsberg, Radia Perlman,
   Mike Shand, and Russ White for their useful comments.

4.  Security Considerations

   This document adds no additional security risks to IS-IS, nor does it
   provide any additional security for IS-IS.

5.  IANA Considerations

   This document specifies the definition of a set of new IS-IS TLVs --
   the Port-Capability TLV (type 143) and the MAC-Reachability TLV
   (type 147).  They are listed in the IS-IS TLV codepoint registry.

                                         IIH  LSP  SNP
   MT-Port-Cap-TLV (143)                  X    -    -
   MAC-RI TLV  (147)                      -    X    -

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [IS-IS]    ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second Edition, "Intermediate System
              to Intermediate System Intra-Domain Routing Information
              Exchange Protocol for use in Conjunction with the Protocol
              for Providing the Connectionless-mode Network Service
              (ISO 8473)", 2002.

   [RFC1195]  Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and
              dual environments", RFC 1195, December 1990.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC5305]  Li, T. and H. Smit, "IS-IS Extensions for Traffic
              Engineering", RFC 5305, October 2008.

6.2.  Informative References

   [802.1aq]  "Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks /
              Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks / Amendment 8:
              Shortest Path Bridging, Draft IEEE P802.1aq/D1.5", 2008.

   [OTV]      Grover, H., Rao, D., and D. Farinacci, "Overlay Transport
              Virtualization", Work in Progress, October 2010.

   [RBRIDGES]
              Perlman, R., Eastlake 3rd, D., Dutt, D., Gai, S., and A.
              Ghanwani, "RBridges: Base Protocol Specification", Work
              in Progress, March 2010.

Authors' Addresses

   Ayan Banerjee
   Cisco Systems
   170 W. Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA  95138
   USA

   EMail: ayabaner@cisco.com


   David Ward
   Juniper Networks
   1194 N. Mathilda Ave.
   Sunnyvale, CA  94089-1206
   USA

   Phone: +1-408-745-2000
   EMail: dward@juniper.net

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMSome Layer-2 systems, such as provider backbone bridges, shortest path bridging and overlay transport virtualization, route using MAC addresses carried in a link state protocol. IS-IS had no way to advertise those addresses.
MECHANISMThe RFC adds a Multi-Topology-Aware Port Capability TLV that announces what a port can do, and a MAC-Reachability TLV that lists the unicast MAC addresses reachable from the router that advertises it.
STATUS TODAYIt is a Proposed Standard from April 2011 that has not been obsoleted or updated. The TLVs are deliberately generic, and each Layer-2 technology defines the parts it needs in its own extension document.

§1Overview

There are a number of systems, for example RBridges, IEEE 802.1aq Shortest Path Bridging and Overlay Transport Virtualization, that use Layer-2 addresses carried in a link state routing protocol, specifically Intermediate System to Intermediate System, to provide true Layer-2 routing. In almost all of those technologies, classical Layer-2 packets are encapsulated with an outer header, and the format of that outer header varies from one technology to another. The outer header is what routes the encapsulated packets to their destination.

Each Intermediate System advertises one or more IS-IS Link State Protocol Data Units with routing information. Each Link State PDU is composed of a fixed header and a number of tuples, each consisting of a Type, a Length and a Value, and such tuples are commonly known as TLVs.

This document specifies a set of TLVs to be added to IS-IS PDUs to support these proposed systems. The TLVs are generic Layer-2 additions, and the specific ones that a given technology needs are defined in the IS-IS technology-specific extensions. This document does not propose any new forwarding mechanisms using the additional information carried within IS-IS.

When a frame crosses a Layer-2 network it is wrapped in an outer header, and that outer header is what carries it to the right place. The wrapping is different in every technology, but the routing information underneath can be shared, so this RFC adds generic fields to IS-IS that the individual technologies fill in as they need.

§2.1The Multi-Topology-Aware Port Capability TLV

The Multi-Topology-aware Port Capability, abbreviated MT-PORT-CAP, is IS-IS TLV type 143. Its format is a one-byte Type field set to 143, a one-byte Length field giving the total number of bytes in the value field including the length of the sub-TLVs it carries, then a two-byte field holding four reserved bits and a 12-bit Topology Identifier, then the sub-TLVs themselves in a variable number of bytes.

The four reserved bits must be sent as zero and ignored on receipt. The Topology Identifier is a 12-bit field containing the MT ID of the topology being announced, and when it is set to zero it implies that the TLV is being used to carry base topology information.

The sub-TLVs in the value field are formatted as described in RFC 5305, and they are defined in the technology-specific documents.

The MT-PORT-CAP TLV may occur multiple times and is carried within an IS-IS Hello PDU.

This field goes in the Hello packets that neighbours exchange. It says which topology the port is on and then carries whatever details that particular Layer-2 technology wants to announce about it.

The Multi-Topology-Aware Port Capability TLV
MT-PORT-CAP TLV
FieldNameSizeValueDescription
TYPEType1 byte143TLV type, set to 143.
LENGTHLength1 byteTotal number of bytes in the value field, including the sub-TLVs it carries.
RESERVEDReserved4 bitsFour reserved bits. Must be sent as zero and ignored on receipt.
TOPOLOGY-IDTopology Identifier12 bits0The MT ID of the topology being announced. Zero means base topology information.
SUB-TLVSSub-TLVs4 bytesSub-TLVs formatted as in RFC 5305, defined in the technology-specific documents. The number of bytes is variable.

§2.2The MAC-Reachability TLV

The MAC-Reachability TLV, abbreviated MAC-RI, is IS-IS TLV type 147. Its format is a one-byte Type field set to 147, a one-byte Length field giving the total number of bytes in the value field, a two-byte Topology-id/Nickname field, a one-byte Confidence field, a two-byte field holding four reserved bits and a 12-bit VLAN-ID, and then the MAC addresses themselves, each six bytes long.

Depending on the technology in which it is used, the Topology-id/Nickname field carries the topology-id or the nickname. When it is set to zero this implies that the MAC addresses are reachable across all topologies, or across all nicknames, of the originating Intermediate System.

The Confidence field carries an 8-bit quantity indicating the confidence level in the MAC addresses being transported. Whether the field is used, and its semantics if it is, are defined further by the specific protocol using Layer-2 IS-IS. If it is not used, it must be set to zero on transmission and ignored on receipt.

The four reserved bits must be sent as zero and ignored on receipt. The VLAN-ID field carries a 12-bit VLAN identifier that is valid for all subsequent MAC addresses in the TLV, or the value zero if no VLAN is specified. Each MAC(i) entry is the 48-bit MAC address reachable from the Intermediate System that is announcing the TLV.

The MAC-RI TLV is carried in a standard Link State PDU. It can be carried multiple times in an LSP and in multiple LSPs. It must contain only unicast addresses. The manner in which these TLVs are generated by the various Layer-2 routing technologies, and the manner in which they are consumed, are detailed in the technology-specific documents. In most of the technologies these MAC-RI TLVs translate into populating the hardware with these entries, together with the appropriate next-hop information as derived from the advertising Intermediate System.

This field goes in the link state packets. It lists the hardware addresses that can be reached from the router sending it, along with the VLAN they sit in, and receivers normally load those entries into their forwarding hardware with a next hop taken from the same advertisement.

The MAC-Reachability TLV, shown with two MAC addresses
MAC-RI TLV
FieldNameSizeValueDescription
TYPEType1 byte147TLV type, set to 147.
LENGTHLength1 byte17Total number of bytes in the value field, which is 5 plus 6 times the number of MAC addresses.
TOPOLOGY-NICKNAMETopology-id/Nickname2 bytes0The topology-id or the nickname, depending on the technology. Zero means reachable across all topologies or nicknames.
CONFIDENCEConfidence1 byte0An 8-bit confidence level in the MAC addresses. If unused it must be set to zero and ignored on receipt.
RESVRESV4 bitsFour reserved bits. Must be sent as zero and ignored on receipt.
VLAN-IDVLAN-ID12 bits0A 12-bit VLAN identifier valid for all subsequent MAC addresses in this TLV, or zero if no VLAN is specified.
MAC-1MAC (1)6 bytesA 48-bit unicast MAC address reachable from the Intermediate System announcing this TLV.
MAC-NMAC (N)6 bytesFurther MAC addresses follow, each 6 bytes long.

§4Security Considerations

This document adds no additional security risks to IS-IS, nor does it provide any additional security for IS-IS.

Nothing new. The security of IS-IS as a whole is unchanged by these two fields, and they do not add any protection of their own.

§5IANA Considerations

The document specifies a set of new IS-IS TLVs, the Port-Capability TLV of type 143 and the MAC-Reachability TLV of type 147, and lists them in the IS-IS TLV codepoint registry.

The MT-Port-Cap-TLV of type 143 is carried in Hello PDUs and not in Link State PDUs or Sequence Numbers PDUs. The MAC-RI TLV of type 147 is carried in Link State PDUs and not in Hello PDUs or Sequence Numbers PDUs.

IANA keeps the list of IS-IS TLV numbers and records which kind of packet each one travels in. Two numbers are added here, one for Hello packets and one for link state packets.

The new IS-IS TLV code points and where each one travels
  • 143MT-Port-Cap-TLV — Carried in Hello PDUs. Announces the capabilities of a port for one topology.
  • 147MAC-RI TLV — Carried in Link State PDUs. Lists the unicast MAC addresses reachable from the advertising router.

§6References

[IS-IS]ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second Edition, "Intermediate System to Intermediate System Intra-Domain Routing Information Exchange Protocol for use in Conjunction with the Protocol for Providing the Connectionless-mode Network Service (ISO 8473)", 2002.
[RFC1195]RFC 1195Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and dual environments", RFC 1195, December 1990.December 1990[RFC2119]RFC 2119Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.March 1997[RFC5305]RFC 5305Li, T. and H. Smit, "IS-IS Extensions for Traffic Engineering", RFC 5305, October 2008.October 2008
[802.1aq]"Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks / Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks / Amendment 8: Shortest Path Bridging", Draft IEEE P802.1aq/D1.5, 2008.
[OTV]Grover, H., Rao, D., and D. Farinacci, "Overlay Transport Virtualization", Work in Progress, October 2010.
[RBRIDGES]Perlman, R., Eastlake 3rd, D., Dutt, D., Gai, S., and A. Ghanwani, "RBridges: Base Protocol Specification", Work in Progress, March 2010.