RFC 660 UNKNOWN ARPANET · INTERFACES

Some changes to the IMP and the IMP/Host interface

Four planned changes to ARPANET message handling and the IMP/Host interface.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
October 1974
AUTHORS
D.C. Walden
STREAM
Legacy
DOI
10.17487/RFC0660

RFC text

Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                       D. Walden (BBN-NET)
Request for Comments: 660                                              Oct 1974
NIC #31202


       SOME CHANGES TO THE IMP AND THE IMP/HOST INTERFACE

In the next few weeks several changes will be made to the IMP
software including changes to the IMP/Host software interface
as specified in BBN Report No. 1822, Specifications for the
Interconnection of a Host and an IMP. These changes come in
four areas: a) decoupling of the message number sequences of
Hosts; b) Host/Host access control; c) expansion of the
message number window from four to eight; and d) provision for
messages outside the normal message number mechanism. All changes
are backward compatible with possible minor exceptions in timing.

a. Decoupling of the Host/Host message number sequences:
   Since 1972 the IMP system has provided for exactly four
   messages to be outstanding at a time between any pair of
   IMPs, and thus, a total of only four messages between
   all the possible pairs of Hosts on the two IMPs. Because
   all the pairs of Hosts on the two IMPs have had to share
   the four outstanding messages, it has been quite possible
   for the various Hosts to interfere with each other. To
   remove this possibility of interference, the IMP's
   message number logic will soon be changed to allow a
   separate message number sequence between each pair of Hosts.

   To keep manageable the space required to maintain the
   Host/Host message sequences above that presently are required
   for the IMP/IMP message sequences, the Host/Host sequences
   will be taken dynamically from a limited pool of possible
   sequences. The pool will be sufficiently large to seldom
   interfere with a pair of Hosts wishing to communicate. In
   no case will Hosts be prevented from communicating. In
   the event that the Hosts on an IMP desire to simultaneously
   communicate with so many other Hosts that the pool would
   be exhausted, the space in the pool is quickly multiplexed
   in time among all the desired Host/Host conversations
   so that none is stopped although all are possibly slowed.

b. Host/Host access control:
   Upon instructions from ARPA, we will soon add a Host/Host
   access control mechanism to the IMPs. Any pair of Hosts
   wishing to communicate is checked (via bits in the IMP)
   to verify that they have administrative permission to
   communicate. This check normally is made whenever a pair
   of Hosts attempts to communicate after not having
   communicated for two minutes. If the pair of Hosts is
   not allowed to communicate, a special type of Destination
   Dead Message (sub-code 3) is returned to the source
   Host. The default case initially will be to allow all
   Hosts to communicate with each other.



                              -1-

c. Message number window.:
   Once the message number sequences are on a Host/Host
   rather than IMP/IMP basis, the number of messages that
   will be permitted to be outstanding at a time between
   a pair of Hosts will be expanded from four to eight,
   permitting increased Host/Host throughput in some cases.

d. Message outside the normal mechanism:.
   For certain limited experiments which are being carried on
   using the network, it is thought to be desirable
   for specified Hosts to be able to communicate outside the
   normal ordered, error controlled message sequences.
   Thus, the following expansion to the IMP/Host protocol is being
   provided.

i. a single packet message coming from the source Host
   to the source IMP with a (new) special message type,
   3, will be put directly into the IMP store-and-forward
   logic with a mark saying the packet is this special
   kind of message. A multi-packet message of type 3
   will be discarded.

ii. such messages (packets) are routed normally to the
   destination IMP, possibly arriving out of order.

iii. at the destination IMP, messages of the special
   type will be put directly on the destination Host
   output queue skipping the reassembly logic and marked
   with a special (new) IMP to Host message type, also 3.

iv. there is no source-to-destination retransmission
   logic, no reassembly, no RFNMs, no incomplete
   transmissions, etc.

v. if at any time there are insufficient resources in the
   network to handle one of these special messages
   (e.g., the destination Host won't take it), the
   message will be discarded.

vi. by using the special message type between the Host
   and the IMP, the normal message number mechanism is
   preserved for all the Host/Host transmissions which
   presently depend on it.

Because the uncontrolled use of this mechanism will degrade the
performance of the network for all users, the set of Hosts permitted
to use this mechanism will be regulated by the Network Control
Center.

Please file this note with your copy of BBN Report 1822 until
that document is updated.



                              -2-

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMHosts sharing two IMPs also shared a four-message window, so one host pair could affect another. The interface also lacked access checks and a way to send experimental packets outside normal sequencing.
MECHANISMThe note announces separate host-pair message sequences, an access check, a window increased from four to eight messages, and a special single-packet type that bypasses sequencing and retransmission.
WHAT CHANGEDThe changes were announced as backward compatible, with possible minor timing differences. The special packet facility was to be restricted by the Network Control Center.

§1Four Planned Interface Changes

RFC 660 announces changes to the IMP software and the IMP/Host interface described in BBN Report 1822. The four areas are host-to-host message numbering, access control, the message window, and a special message outside the normal mechanism.

The note says the changes are backward compatible, although timing may differ slightly. It asks readers to keep the note with their copy of BBN Report 1822 until that report is updated.

The network's IMPs are getting four interface changes. The note says existing hosts should continue to work, though timing may shift slightly.

§2Separate Sequences and Access Checks

Previously, four outstanding messages between a pair of IMPs were shared by every host pair attached to those IMPs. The planned change gives each host pair a separate message-number sequence, selected dynamically from a limited pool. If many conversations exhaust the pool, it is shared over time; none is stopped, though all may slow.

The IMPs will also check administrative permission when hosts try to communicate after two minutes without communication. Initially, the default allows all hosts. A denied pair receives a Destination Dead Message with sub-code 3. The outstanding-message window grows from four to eight.

Each pair of hosts gets its own message count, reducing interference. The IMP also checks permission after a quiet period and can allow up to eight outstanding messages per pair.

§3The Special Single-Packet Message

Specified hosts may use new type 3 for limited experiments that do not need the normal ordered, error-controlled sequence. The source IMP accepts only a single-packet message of this type; a multi-packet message is discarded.

The packet travels by normal routing and may arrive out of order. The destination IMP puts it directly on the host output queue, without reassembly, retransmission, RFNMs, or incomplete-transmission handling. If resources are insufficient, it is discarded. The Network Control Center regulates which hosts may use this facility because uncontrolled use could harm network performance.

This experimental packet can arrive out of order or be discarded. It skips retries and reassembly, so only approved hosts may use it.