RFC 7003 PROPOSED STANDARD RTP · RTCP · METRICS

RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard: RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Discard Metric Reporting

An RTCP report block that shows whether discarded packets came in clumps or were spread out.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
September 2013
AUTHORS
A. Clark, R. Huang, Q. Wu
STREAM
IETF
BLOCK TYPE
20
BLOCK LENGTH
3 (32-bit words)
BLOCK SIZE
4 words of 32 bits, 16 bytes
OVER-RANGE VALUE
0xFFFFFE
UNAVAILABLE MEASUREMENT
0xFFFFFF
SDP PARAMETER
burst-gap-discard
DOI
10.17487/RFC7003
ERRATA
Reported errata

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          A. Clark
Request for Comments: 7003                                      Telchemy
Category: Standards Track                                       R. Huang
ISSN: 2070-1721                                               Q. Wu, Ed.
                                                                  Huawei
                                                          September 2013


         RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block
                 for Burst/Gap Discard Metric Reporting

Abstract

   This document defines an RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report
   (XR) block that allows the reporting of burst and gap discard metrics
   for use in a range of RTP applications.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7003.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents
   1. Introduction ....................................................2
      1.1. Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block ............................2
      1.2. RTCP and RTCP Extended Reports .............................3
      1.3. Performance Metrics Framework ..............................3
      1.4. Applicability ..............................................3
   2. Terminology .....................................................3
   3. Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block .................................4
      3.1. Report Block Structure .....................................5
      3.2. Definition of Fields in Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block ....5
      3.3. Derived Metrics Based on Reported Metrics ..................7
   4. Considerations for Voice-over-IP Applications ...................7
   5. SDP Signaling ...................................................8
      5.1. SDP rtcp-xr Attribute Extension ............................8
      5.2. Offer/Answer Usage .........................................8
   6. IANA Considerations .............................................8
      6.1. New RTCP XR Block Type Value ...............................8
      6.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter ..................................9
      6.3. Contact Information for Registrations ......................9
   7. Security Considerations .........................................9
   8. Contributors ....................................................9
   9. Acknowledgments .................................................9
   10. References ....................................................10
      10.1. Normative References .....................................10
      10.2. Informative References ...................................10
   Appendix A.  Metrics Represented Using the Template from RFC 6390..12

1.  Introduction

1.1.  Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block

   This document defines a new block type to augment those defined in
   [RFC3611] for use in a range of RTP applications.  The new block type
   supports the reporting of the proportion of packets discarded by the
   jitter buffer at the receiver, using packet discard logic according
   to the jitter buffer algorithms.  The discards during discard bursts
   are reported, together with the number of bursts.  This block is
   intended to be used in conjunction with [RFC7002], which provides the
   total packets discarded and on which this block therefore depends.
   However, the metric in [RFC7002] may be used independently of the
   metrics in this block.

   This block provides information on transient IP problems.  Burst/gap
   metrics are typically used in cumulative reports; however, they also
   may be used in interval reports (see the Interval Metric flag in
   Section 3.2).  The burstiness of packet discard affects user
   experience, may influence any sender strategies to mitigate the
   problem, and may also have diagnostic value.

   The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end-system
   metrics defined in [RFC6792].

   The definitions of "burst", "gap", "loss", and "discard" are
   consistent with the definitions in [RFC3611].  To accommodate the
   range of jitter buffer algorithms and packet discard logic that may
   be used by implementors, the method used to distinguish between
   bursts and gaps shall use an equivalent method to that defined in
   Section 4.7.2 of [RFC3611].  Note that reporting the specific jitter
   buffer algorithms and/or packet discard logic is out of the scope of
   this document.

1.2.  RTCP and RTCP Extended Reports

   The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in [RFC3550].  [RFC3611]
   defined an extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended
   Report (XR).  This document defines a new Extended Report block for
   use with [RFC3550] and [RFC3611].

1.3.  Performance Metrics Framework

   The Performance Metrics Framework [RFC6390] provides guidance on the
   definition and specification of performance metrics.  The RTP
   Monitoring Framework [RFC6792] provides guidelines for reporting
   block format using RTCP XR.  The metrics block described in this
   document is in accordance with the guidelines in [RFC6390] and
   [RFC6792].

1.4.  Applicability

   These metrics are applicable to a range of RTP applications that
   contain de-jitter buffers [RFC5481] at the receiving end to smooth
   variation in packet-arrival time and don't use stream repair means,
   e.g., Forward Error Correction (FEC) [RFC5109] and/or retransmission
   [RFC4588].

2.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

   In addition, the following terms are defined:

   Received, Lost, and Discarded

      A packet shall be regarded as "lost" if it fails to arrive within
      an implementation-specific time window.  A packet that arrives
      within this time window but is too early to be played out, too
      late to be played out, or thrown away before playout due to packet
      duplication or redundancy shall be regarded as discarded.  A
      packet shall not be regarded as discarded if it arrives within
      this time window but is dropped during decoding by some higher-
      layer decoder, e.g., due to a decoding error.  A packet shall be
      classified as one of received (or OK), discarded, or lost.  The
      metric "cumulative number of packets lost" defined in [RFC3550]
      reports a count of packets lost from the media stream (single
      synchronization source (SSRC) within a single RTP session).
      Similarly, the metric "number of packets discarded" defined in
      [RFC7002] reports a count of packets discarded from the media
      stream (single SSRC within a single RTP session) arriving at the
      receiver.  Another metric, defined in [RFC5725], is available to
      report on packets that are not recovered by any repair techniques
      that may be in use.  Note that the term "discard" defined here
      builds on the "discard" definition in [RFC3611] but extends the
      concept to take into account packet duplication and reports
      different types of discard counts [RFC7002].

   Bursts and Gaps

      The terms "burst" and "gap" are used in a manner consistent with
      that of RTCP XR [RFC3611].  RTCP XR views an RTP stream as being
      divided into bursts, which are periods during which the discard
      rate is high enough to cause noticeable quality degradation
      (generally over 5 percent discard rate), and gaps, which are
      periods during which discarded packets are infrequent and hence
      quality is generally acceptable.

3.  Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block

   Metrics in this block report on burst/gap discard in the stream
   arriving at the RTP system.  Measurements of these metrics are made
   at the receiving end of the RTP stream.  Instances of this metrics
   block use the synchronization source (SSRC) to refer to the separate
   auxiliary Measurement Information Block [RFC6776], which describes
   measurement periods in use (see [RFC6776], Section 4.2).

   This metrics block relies on the measurement period in the
   Measurement Information Block indicating the span of the report.
   Senders MUST send this block in the same compound RTCP packet as the
   Measurement Information Block.  Receivers MUST verify that the
   measurement period is received in the same compound RTCP packet as
   this metrics block.  If not, this metrics block MUST be discarded.

3.1.  Report Block Structure

   The structure of the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block is as follows.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     BT=20     | I |   resv    |      Block Length = 3         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        SSRC of Source                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |   Threshold   |         Packets Discarded in Bursts           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       Total Packets Expected in Bursts        |   Reserved    |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                     Figure 1: Report Block Structure

3.2.  Definition of Fields in Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block

   Block Type (BT): 8 bits

      A Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block is identified by the constant
      20.

   Interval Metric flag (I): 2 bits

      This field is used to indicate whether the burst/gap discard
      metrics are Sampled, Interval, or Cumulative metrics [RFC6792]:

         I=10: Interval Duration - the reported value applies to the
         most recent measurement interval duration between successive
         metrics reports.

         I=11: Cumulative Duration - the reported value applies to the
         accumulation period characteristic of cumulative measurements.

         I=01: Sampled Value - the reported value is a sampled
         instantaneous value.

      In this document, burst/gap discard metrics can only be measured
      over definite intervals and cannot be sampled.  Also, the value
      I=00 is reserved for future use.  Senders MUST NOT use the values
      I=00 or I=01.  If a block is received with I=00 or I=01, the
      receiver MUST discard the block.

   Reserved (resv): 6 bits

      These bits are reserved.  They MUST be set to zero by senders and
      ignored by receivers (see [RFC6709], Section 4.2).

   Block Length: 16 bits

      The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one.  For
      the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block, the block length is equal to
      3.  The block MUST be discarded if the block length is set to a
      different value.

   SSRC of Source: 32 bits

      As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611].

   Threshold: 8 bits

      The Threshold is equivalent to Gmin in [RFC3611], i.e., the number
      of successive packets that must not be discarded prior to and
      following a discard packet in order for this discarded packet to
      be regarded as part of a gap.  Note that the Threshold is set in
      accordance with the Gmin calculation defined in Section 4.7.2 of
      [RFC3611].

   Packets Discarded in Bursts: 24 bits

      The total number of packets discarded during discard bursts.

      The measured value is unsigned value.  If the measured value
      exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate
      an over-range measurement.  If the measurement is unavailable, the
      value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported.

   Total Packets Expected in Bursts: 24 bits

      The total number of packets expected during discard bursts (that
      is, the sum of received packets and lost packets).

      The measured value is unsigned value.  If the measured value
      exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate
      an over-range measurement.  If the measurement is unavailable, the
      value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported.

   Reserved: 8 bits

      These bits are reserved.  They MUST be set to zero by senders and
      ignored by receivers (See [RFC6709], Section 4.2).

3.3.  Derived Metrics Based on Reported Metrics

   The metrics described here are intended to be used in conjunction
   with information from the Measurement Information Block [RFC6776] and
   also with the metric "number of packets discarded" provided in the
   RTCP XR Discard Count Metrics Block [RFC7002].

   These metrics provide the following information relevant to
   statistical parameters, including:

   o  The fraction of packets discarded during bursts (Burst Discard
      Rate in [RFC7004]), which can be calculated using the metric
      "Packets Discarded in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets
      Expected in Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics
      Block.

   o  The fraction of packets discarded during gaps (Gap Discard Rate in
      [RFC7004]), which can be calculated using the metric "Packets
      Discarded in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets Expected in
      Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block.

   The details on calculation these parameters in the metrics are
   described in [RFC7004].

4.  Considerations for Voice-over-IP Applications

   This metrics block is applicable to a broad range of RTP
   applications.  Where the metric is used with a Voice-over-IP (VoIP)
   application and the stream repair means is not available, the
   following considerations apply.

   RTCP XR views a call as being divided into bursts, which are periods
   during which the discard rate is high enough to cause noticeable call
   quality degradation (generally over 5 percent discard rate) and gaps,
   which are periods during which discarded packets are infrequent and
   hence call quality is generally acceptable.

   If voice activity detection is used, the burst and gap duration shall
   be determined as if silence packets had been sent, i.e., a period of
   silence in excess of Gmin packets will terminate a burst condition.

   The recommended value for the threshold Gmin in [RFC3611] results in
   a burst being a period of time during which the call quality is
   degraded to a similar extent to a typical pulse code modulation (PCM)
   severely errored second.

5.  SDP Signaling

   [RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol)
   [RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks.  XR blocks MAY be used
   without prior signaling.

5.1.  SDP rtcp-xr Attribute Extension

   This section augments the SDP [RFC4566] attribute "rtcp-xr" defined
   in [RFC3611] by providing an additional value of "xr-format" to
   signal the use of the report block defined in this document.  The
   ABNF [RFC5234] syntax is as follows.

   xr-format =/ xr-bgd-block

   xr-bgd-block = "burst-gap-discard"

5.2.  Offer/Answer Usage

   When SDP is used in Offer/Answer context, the SDP Offer/Answer usage
   defined in [RFC3611] for unilateral "rtcp-xr" attribute parameters
   applies.  For detailed usage in Offer/Answer for unilateral
   parameters, refer to Section 5.2 of [RFC3611].

6.  IANA Considerations

   New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration.  For
   general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to
   [RFC3611].

6.1.  New RTCP XR Block Type Value

   This document assigns the block type value 20 in the IANA "RTP
   Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Type Registry" to
   the "Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block".

6.2.  New RTCP XR SDP Parameter

   This document also registers a new parameter "burst-gap-discard" in
   the "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Session
   Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters Registry".

6.3.  Contact Information for Registrations

   The contact information for the registrations is:

   Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com)
   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
   China

7.  Security Considerations

   It is believed that this RTCP XR block introduces no new security
   considerations beyond those described in [RFC3611].  This block does
   not provide per-packet statistics, so the risk to confidentiality
   documented in Section 7, paragraph 3 of [RFC3611] does not apply.

8.  Contributors

   Geoff Hunt wrote the initial draft of this document.

9.  Acknowledgments

   The authors gratefully acknowledge reviews and feedback provided by
   Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Claire Bi, Bob Biskner, Benoit
   Claise, Kevin Connor, Claus Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Stephen
   Farrell, Jim Frauenthal, Albert Higashi, Tom Hock, Shane Holthaus,
   Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Paul Kyzivat, Keith Lantz, Mohamed Mostafa,
   Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi Raviraj, Dan
   Romascanu, Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, and Hideaki Yamada.

10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC3550]  Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
              Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
              Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003.

   [RFC3611]  Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control
              Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", RFC 3611, November
              2003.

   [RFC4566]  Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
              Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.

   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.

   [RFC5725]  Begen, A., Hsu, D., and M. Lague, "Post-Repair Loss RLE
              Report Block Type for RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended
              Reports (XRs)", RFC 5725, February 2010.

   [RFC6776]  Clark, A. and Q. Wu, "Measurement Identity and Information
              Reporting Using a Source Description (SDES) Item and an
              RTCP Extended Report (XR) Block", RFC 6776, October 2012.

   [RFC7002]  Clark, A., Zorn, G., and Q. Wu, "RTP Control Protocol
              (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) for Discard Count Metric
              Reporting", RFC 7002, September 2013.

   [RFC7004]  Zorn, G., Schott, R., Wu, Q., Ed., and R. Huang, "RTP
              Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for
              Summary Statistics Metrics Reporting", RFC 7004, September
              2013.

10.2.  Informative References

   [RFC4588]  Rey, J., Leon, D., Miyazaki, A., Varsa, V., and R.
              Hakenberg, "RTP Retransmission Payload Format", RFC 4588,
              July 2006.

   [RFC5109]  Li, A., "RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error
              Correction", RFC 5109, December 2007.

   [RFC5481]  Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation
              Applicability Statement", RFC 5481, March 2009.

   [RFC6390]  Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New
              Performance Metric Development", BCP 170, RFC 6390,
              October 2011.

   [RFC6709]  Carpenter, B., Aboba, B., and S. Cheshire, "Design
              Considerations for Protocol Extensions", RFC 6709,
              September 2012.

   [RFC6792]  Wu, Q., Hunt, G., and P. Arden, "Guidelines for Use of the
              RTP Monitoring Framework", RFC 6792, November 2012.

Appendix A.  Metrics Represented Using the Template from RFC 6390

   a.  Burst/Gap Discard Threshold in RTP Metric

       *  Metric Name: Burst/gap discard threshold in RTP

       *  Metric Description: The Threshold is equivalent to Gmin in
          [RFC3611], i.e., the number of successive packets that must
          not be discarded prior to and following a discard packet in
          order for this discarded packet to be regarded as part of a
          gap.

       *  Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2,
          Threshold definition.

       *  Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Threshold definition.

       *  Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
          Section 3, 1st paragraph.

       *  Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for
          measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.

       *  Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.

       *  Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

   b.  Packets Discarded in Bursts Metric

       *  Metric Name: RTP packets discarded in bursts

       *  Metric Description: The total number of RTP packets discarded
          during discard bursts.

       *  Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Packets
          Discarded in Bursts definition.

       *  Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Packets Discarded in
          Bursts definition.

       *  Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
          Section 3, 1st paragraph.

       *  Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for
          measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.

       *  Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.

       *  Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

   c.  Total Packets Expected in Discard Bursts Metric

       *  Metric Name: Total RTP packets expected in discard bursts

       *  Metric Description: The total number of packets expected
          during discard bursts (that is, the sum of received packets
          and lost packets).

       *  Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Total
          Packets Expected in Bursts definition.

       *  Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Total Packets Expected
          in Bursts definition.

       *  Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
          Section 3, 1st paragraph.

       *  Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for
          measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.

       *  Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.

       *  Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

Authors' Addresses

   Alan Clark
   Telchemy Incorporated
   2905 Premiere Parkway, Suite 280
   Duluth, GA  30097
   USA

   EMail: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com


   Rachel Huang
   Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
   China

   EMail: Rachel@huawei.com


   Qin Wu (editor)
   Huawei
   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
   China

   EMail: sunseawq@huawei.com

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMThe discard count report of RFC 7002 says how many packets the receiver threw away, but not how they were arranged. A hundred drops spread evenly and a hundred drops in one bad moment are different problems, and they call for different fixes.
MECHANISMThe RFC defines an RTCP Extended Report block, block type 20, that reports how many packets were discarded during bursts and how many packets were expected during those bursts, together with the threshold that separates a burst from a gap. It depends on the discard count block of RFC 7002 and is normally sent beside it.
WHAT IT SHOWSWith the two blocks and the measurement information block, a sender or network manager can work out the burst discard rate and the gap discard rate, and so see whether the trouble was concentrated in short bad periods or spread across the call.

§1What the Block Adds

The RFC defines a new block type to augment those defined in RFC 3611, for use in a range of RTP applications. The new block type supports the reporting of the proportion of packets discarded by the jitter buffer at the receiver, using the packet discard logic of the jitter buffer algorithms. The discards during discard bursts are reported, together with the number of bursts. The block is intended to be used together with RFC 7002, which provides the total number of packets discarded and on which this block therefore depends, although the metric in RFC 7002 can be used on its own.

The block gives information on transient IP problems. Burst and gap metrics are typically used in cumulative reports, but they can also be used in interval reports. The burstiness of packet discard affects user experience, may influence any sender strategies used to mitigate the problem, and also has diagnostic value. The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end-system metrics defined in RFC 6792.

The definitions of burst, gap, loss and discard are consistent with those in RFC 3611. To accommodate the range of jitter buffer algorithms and packet discard logic that implementors may use, the method used to tell bursts from gaps shall use an equivalent method to the one defined in Section 4.7.2 of RFC 3611. Reporting which jitter buffer algorithm or discard logic was used is out of the scope of the document.

The metrics apply to a range of RTP applications that contain a de-jitter buffer (RFC 5481) at the receiving end to smooth the variation in packet arrival time, and that do not use stream repair means such as Forward Error Correction (RFC 5109) or retransmission (RFC 4588).

This block counts the packets the receiver threw away while things were going badly, and says how many packets it expected to receive during those bad periods. The two numbers together describe how bad the bad periods were.

It is meant to be used with the discard count block of RFC 7002, which reports the total number of packets thrown away. The two blocks answer different questions: that one asks how many were dropped, this one asks when.

§2Bursts and Gaps

The terms burst and gap are used in the same manner as in RTCP XR. RTCP XR views an RTP stream as being divided into bursts, which are periods during which the discard rate is high enough to cause noticeable quality degradation, generally over 5 percent, and gaps, which are periods during which discarded packets are infrequent and hence quality is generally acceptable.

The RFC also restates the three fates of a packet. A packet is lost if it fails to arrive within an implementation-specific time window. A packet that arrives within that window but is too early to be played out, too late to be played out, or thrown away before playout because of packet duplication or redundancy is discarded. A packet that arrives within the window but is dropped during decoding by a higher layer decoder, for example because of a decoding error, is not discarded. Every packet is classified as received, which the RFC also calls OK, discarded, or lost.

The discard count metric defined in RFC 7002 reports the packets discarded from the media stream, a single synchronization source within a single RTP session, arriving at the receiver. The term discard here builds on the definition in RFC 3611 but extends it to take packet duplication into account, and reports different types of discard counts.

The document divides the stream into two kinds of period. In a burst, the receiver is dropping so many packets that people notice, generally more than one in twenty. In a gap, drops are rare and the call still sounds acceptable.

The threshold between the two is set by the receiver, and it counts the number of good packets that have to go by, before and after a dropped packet, for that packet to count as part of a quiet period rather than a burst.

THE TWO KINDS OF PERIOD IN A STREAM
PeriodWhat happens in it
BurstThe discard rate is high enough to cause noticeable quality degradation, generally over 5 percent
GapDiscarded packets are infrequent and hence quality is generally acceptable

§3.1The Block Layout

The metrics in the block report on burst and gap discard in the stream arriving at the RTP system, and the measurements are made at the receiving end. Instances of the block use the synchronization source to refer to the separate auxiliary Measurement Information Block of RFC 6776, which describes the measurement periods in use.

The block relies on the measurement period in that block to indicate the span of the report. Senders MUST send this block in the same compound RTCP packet as the Measurement Information Block. Receivers MUST verify that the measurement period was received in the same compound RTCP packet as this block, and if it was not, this block MUST be discarded.

The block has a fixed layout of four 32-bit words. The first word holds the block type, the interval metric flag and the reserved bits, followed by the block length. The second word holds the SSRC of the source. The third word holds the threshold and the number of packets discarded in bursts. The fourth holds the total number of packets expected during bursts and a final reserved field.

The count has to be sent with the block that says which time period it covers, in the same packet. If that block is missing, the receiver is told to throw the count away, because a count without a period cannot be interpreted.

The block itself is four words long: a header word, a word naming the stream, and two words carrying the threshold and the two counts.

THE BURST/GAP DISCARD METRICS BLOCK
Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block
FieldNameSizeValueDescription
BTBT1 byte20Block type, the constant 20.
INTERVAL-FLAGI2 bitsInterval metric flag: interval or cumulative only.
RESERVEDresv6 bitsReserved bits; senders set them to zero and receivers ignore them.
BLOCK-LENGTHBlock Length2 bytes3Length of the block in 32-bit words minus one.
SSRCSSRC of Source4 bytesThe synchronization source the counts belong to.
THRESHOLDThreshold1 byteThe number of successive packets that must not be discarded for a discard to count as part of a gap.
DISCARDED-IN-BURSTSPackets Discarded in Bursts3 bytesThe total number of packets discarded during the discard bursts.
EXPECTED-IN-BURSTSTotal Packets Expected in Bursts3 bytesThe total number of packets expected during the discard bursts, received plus lost.
RESERVED-2Reserved1 byteReserved bits; senders set them to zero and receivers ignore them.

§3.2The Fields and Their Values

The block type is 8 bits and identifies the block with the constant 20. The interval metric flag is 2 bits and says whether the metrics are sampled, interval or cumulative: I=10 for the most recent measurement interval between successive metrics reports, I=11 for the accumulation period characteristic of cumulative measurements, and I=01 for a sampled instantaneous value. The burst and gap discard metrics can only be measured over definite intervals and cannot be sampled, and the value I=00 is reserved for future use. Senders MUST NOT use I=00 or I=01, and a receiver that gets a block with either value MUST discard it.

The reserved field after the flag is 6 bits. Senders MUST set them to zero and receivers ignore them. The block length is 16 bits and gives the length of the report block in 32-bit words minus one. For this block it is 3, and the block MUST be discarded if the length is set to any other value. The SSRC of source is 32 bits, as defined in Section 4.1 of RFC 3611.

The threshold is 8 bits and is equivalent to Gmin in RFC 3611: the number of successive packets that must not be discarded before and after a discarded packet for that packet to be regarded as part of a gap. It is set in accordance with the Gmin calculation of Section 4.7.2 of that document.

Packets discarded in bursts is 24 bits and is the total number of packets discarded during the discard bursts. The measured value is unsigned. If it exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement, and if the measurement is unavailable the value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported. Total packets expected in bursts is 24 bits and is the total number of packets expected during the discard bursts, that is the sum of received packets and lost packets, with the same over-range and unavailable values. A final reserved field of 8 bits is set to zero by senders and ignored by receivers.

The header says how the counts were measured and how long the block is, and a receiver that sees the wrong values for either is told to ignore the block. Only two of the three possible measurement styles are allowed, because these counts cannot be taken at a single instant.

The threshold is the number of good packets that have to go by, before and after a dropped packet, for that packet to count as part of a gap rather than a burst. The two counts are then how many packets were dropped during the bursts and how many were expected during them.

§3.3What the Counts Let You Work Out

The metrics are intended to be used with the information from the Measurement Information Block of RFC 6776 and with the number of packets discarded provided by the Discard Count Metrics Block of RFC 7002.

Together they provide the information needed for statistical parameters. The first is the fraction of packets discarded during bursts, which the RFC names the Burst Discard Rate in RFC 7004, calculated from the packets discarded in bursts and the total packets expected in bursts. The second is the fraction of packets discarded during gaps, which the RFC names the Gap Discard Rate in RFC 7004, which the RFC also calculates from those same two metrics. The details of how these parameters are calculated are given in RFC 7004.

The two counts are not the end of the story. Combined with the total discard count from RFC 7002, they let the reader work out two rates: the proportion of packets lost during the bad periods, and the proportion lost during the quiet ones.

A rate that is high during bursts and low during gaps says the trouble is concentrated. A rate that is the same in both says the trouble is steady. The exact arithmetic is set out in RFC 7004.

WHAT THE TWO COUNTS AND THE OTHER BLOCKS LET YOU WORK OUT
  • Burst discard rateThe fraction of packets discarded during bursts, calculated from the packets discarded in bursts and the packets expected in bursts.
  • Gap discard rateThe fraction of packets discarded during gaps, calculated by RFC 7004 from the same two metrics.
  • Total discardedThe number of packets discarded in the period, taken from the Discard Count Metrics Block of RFC 7002.
  • The period itselfThe span of the report, taken from the Measurement Information Block of RFC 6776, which has to arrive in the same packet.

§4Voice-over-IP Considerations

The metrics block is applicable to a broad range of RTP applications. Where it is used with a Voice-over-IP application and no stream repair means is available, the RFC sets out further considerations.

RTCP XR views a call as being divided into bursts, which are periods during which the discard rate is high enough to cause noticeable call quality degradation, generally over 5 percent, and gaps, during which discarded packets are infrequent and the call quality is generally acceptable.

If voice activity detection is used, the burst and gap duration shall be determined as if silence packets had been sent, so a period of silence in excess of Gmin packets will terminate a burst condition. The recommended value for the threshold Gmin in RFC 3611 results in a burst being a period of time during which the call quality is degraded to a similar extent to a typical pulse code modulation severely errored second.

For a voice call, the same two kinds of period apply, with the same threshold of about one dropped packet in twenty.

One adjustment is needed for calls that go quiet when nobody is speaking. The length of a burst or a gap is measured as if the silence packets had been sent, so that a quiet spell ends the burst rather than extending it.

§5Signalling the Block with SDP

RFC 3611 defines the use of SDP (RFC 4566) for signalling the use of XR blocks, although XR blocks MAY be used without prior signalling.

This RFC extends the rtcp-xr SDP attribute of RFC 3611 with an additional value of xr-format to signal the use of the report block defined here. The ABNF is xr-format =/ xr-bgd-block and xr-bgd-block = "burst-gap-discard". Where SDP is used in an offer and answer context, the unilateral rtcp-xr attribute parameter usage defined in Section 5.2 of RFC 3611 applies.

IANA has assigned the block type value 20 in the RTCP XR Block Type Registry to the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block, and the new parameter burst-gap-discard in the RTCP XR SDP Parameters Registry.

The block can be used without any negotiation. If the two ends want to agree on it first, it is announced in the session description, in the same attribute used for the other extended report blocks, with the value burst-gap-discard.

§7Security Considerations

It is believed that this RTCP XR block introduces no new security considerations beyond those described in RFC 3611. The block does not provide per-packet statistics, so the risk to confidentiality documented in Section 7, paragraph 3 of RFC 3611 does not apply.

The block adds no new security risk, because it reports summary counts rather than anything about individual packets.

§9References

[RFC2119]RFC 2119Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.March 1997[RFC3550]RFC 3550Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003.July 2003[RFC3611]RFC 3611Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", RFC 3611, November 2003.November 2003[RFC4566]RFC 4566Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.July 2006[RFC4588]RFC 4588Rey, J., Leon, D., Miyazaki, A., Varsa, V., and R. Hakenberg, "RTP Retransmission Payload Format", RFC 4588, July 2006.July 2006[RFC5109]RFC 5109Li, A., "RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction", RFC 5109, December 2007.December 2007[RFC5234]RFC 5234Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.January 2008[RFC5481]RFC 5481Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement", RFC 5481, March 2009.March 2009[RFC5725]RFC 5725Begen, A., Hsu, D., and M. Lague, "Post-Repair Loss RLE Report Block Type for RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Reports (XRs)", RFC 5725, February 2010.February 2010[RFC6390]RFC 6390Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development", BCP 170, RFC 6390, October 2011.October 2011[RFC6709]RFC 6709Carpenter, B., Aboba, B., and S. Cheshire, "Design Considerations for Protocol Extensions", RFC 6709, September 2012.September 2012[RFC6776]RFC 6776Clark, A. and Q. Wu, "Measurement Identity and Information Reporting Using a Source Description (SDES) Item and an RTCP Extended Report (XR) Block", RFC 6776, October 2012.October 2012[RFC6792]RFC 6792Wu, Q., Hunt, G., and P. Arden, "Guidelines for Use of the RTP Monitoring Framework", RFC 6792, November 2012.November 2012[RFC7002]RFC 7002Clark, A., Zorn, G., and Q. Wu, "RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) for Discard Count Metric Reporting", RFC 7002, September 2013.September 2013[RFC7004]RFC 7004Zorn, G., Schott, R., Wu, Q., Ed., and R. Huang, "RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for Summary Statistics Metrics Reporting", RFC 7004, September 2013.September 2013