RFC 78 UNKNOWN HISTORY · META

NCP Status Report: UCSB/Rand

Results of console-to-console NCP testing between UCSB and RAND.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
October 1970
AUTHORS
E. Harslem, J.F. Heafner, J.E. White
STREAM
Legacy
TESTING SITES
UCSB and RAND
PROTOCOL REFERENCE
Document #1
DOI
10.17487/RFC0078

RFC text

Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                   E. Harslem
Request for Comments:  78                               J. Heafner
NIC 5199                                                J. White


                     NCP Status Report:  UCSB/RAND

NCP Checkout

   UCSB an RAND recently conducted UCSB console to/from RAND console
   validation fo teh respective NCPs.  The exercise was simply to verify
   that the NCPs behaved according to Document #1 protocol.

What was Learned

   The UCSB and RAND NCPs responded as specified in Document #1.  RAND
   uncovered a few minor problems with their Network Services Program
   (NSP) that interfaces video graphics consoles to the NCP.  The nature
   of these problems were data format conversions and human factors
   aspects of display presentation of status information.

The Immediate Future

   1. Both UCSB and RAND will be happy to participate with other sites
   in verifying their NCPs.

   2. We intend to conduct additional exercises involving data re-
   configurations and file transmissions.



   JFH:hs


         [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
           [ into the online RFC archives by Josh Elliott 1/98 ]

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMUCSB and RAND needed to check whether their Network Control Programs behaved according to Document #1.
MECHANISMThe sites tested their NCPs by connecting UCSB and RAND consoles to each other.
TEST RESULTSBoth NCPs responded as specified; RAND found minor issues in its Network Services Program interface involving data conversion and status display.

§1NCP Checkout

UCSB and RAND conducted console-to-console validation of their Network Control Programs. The exercise was intended to verify that the NCPs behaved according to Document #1 protocol.

The two sites connected their consoles through their NCPs to check protocol behavior. The report describes this as a validation exercise.

§1What the Test Found

The report says the UCSB and RAND NCPs responded as specified in Document #1. RAND found a few minor problems in its Network Services Program, which interfaces video graphics consoles to the NCP.

The problems concerned data-format conversions and human factors in the presentation of status information on displays.

The NCPs followed the specified behavior. The issues RAND found concerned data conversion and how status information appeared on the console.

§1Planned Follow-Up

UCSB and RAND offered to participate in validation exercises with other sites. They planned further exercises involving data reconfigurations and file transmissions.

The sites offered to test with others and planned to examine data reconfiguration and file transfer next.