RFC 228 UNKNOWN ERRATA · ARPANET

Clarification

A one-line correction to a FORTRAN program in RFC 70.

RFC EDITOR

Walden, D.C., "Clarification", RFC 228, DOI 10.17487/RFC0228, September 1971, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc228>.

BIBTEX

@misc{rfc228,
  series = {Request for Comments},
  number = 228,
  howpublished = {RFC 228},
  publisher = {RFC Editor},
  doi = {10.17487/RFC0228},
  url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc228},
  author = {D.C. Walden},
  title = {{Clarification}},
  pagetotal = 1,
  year = 1971,
  month = sep,
}

PUBLISHED: September 1971
AUTHORS: D.C. Walden
STREAM: Legacy
BUILDS ON: RFC 70 — Note on Padding
DOI: 10.17487/RFC0228

LINEAGE · FROM THE RFC INDEXOpen full graph →

'70RFC 70Note on Padding '71RFC 228Clarification

RFC text

Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗

Network Working Group                        Dave Walden
Request for Comments #228                    BBN
NIC #7645                                    22 September 1971
Categories:  B.2, C.2
Updates:  RFC #70
Obsoletes:  none


                             CLARIFICATION

     The second statement before statement 20 in the FORTRAN

program on page 7 of RFC #70 should read

                             N=1




DCW/jm







    [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
    [ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the   ]
    [ direction of Alex McKenzie.                   12/96   ]

ISO Plain Language

On this page

PROBLEMA statement in the FORTRAN program on page 7 of RFC 70 needed correction.

MECHANISMRFC 228 says that the second statement before statement 20 should read N=1.

CORRECTIONThe document updates RFC 70 and contains no other technical correction.

§1The Program Line

RFC 228 is titled “Clarification” and updates RFC 70. It identifies a specific line in the FORTRAN program on page 7 of that earlier RFC: the second statement before statement 20.

This RFC points to one statement in the program printed in RFC 70. It identifies the statement by its position on the page.

§2The Corrected Text

The second statement before statement 20 in the FORTRAN program on page 7 of RFC 70 should read N=1. This is the correction supplied by RFC 228.

The corrected line is N=1. No other change is specified.

§3Scope of the Clarification

The memo contains a single correction to the earlier program. Its header says that it updates RFC 70 and lists no obsolete document. The remaining text includes a note about preparing the RFC in machine-readable form for the online archive.

The clarification is limited to one program statement. The RFC also includes an archival note.