RFC 3192 DRAFT STANDARD EMAIL · ADDRESSING · FAX

Fax Email Address: Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail

How to write a fax machine's telephone number as the local part of an ordinary email address.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
October 2001
AUTHORS
C. Allocchio
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 2304 — Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail, RFC 2846 — GSTN addressing in email
SERVICE SELECTOR FOR FAX
FAX
SUB-ADDRESS KEYWORD
T33S
SUB-ADDRESS CHARACTERS
Digits only
GLOBAL PHONE FORM
A plus sign followed by digits
PERMITTED SEPARATORS
Hyphen and dot, ignored by implementations
MULTIPLE SUB-ADDRESSES
Each one needs its own fax-email address
DOI
10.17487/RFC3192

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                       C. Allocchio
Request for Comments: 3192                                    GARR-Italy
Obsoletes: 2304                                             October 2001
Updates: 2846
Category: Standards Track


              Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This memo describes a simple method of encoding Global Switched
   Telephone Network (GSTN) addresses of facsimile devices in the
   local-part of Internet email addresses.

1. Introduction

   As with all Internet mail addresses, the left-hand-side (local-part)
   of an address generated according to this specification, is not to be
   interpreted except by the MTA that is named on the right-hand-side
   (domain).

   Since the very first e-mail to fax gateway objects appeared, a number
   of different methods to specify a fax address as an e-mail address
   have been used by implementors.  Several objectives for this methods
   have been identified, like to enable an e-mail user to send and
   receive faxes from his/her e-mail interface, to allow some kind of
   "fax over e-mail service" transport (possibly reducing the costs of
   GSTN long distance transmissions) while using the existing e-mail
   infrastructure.

   This memo describes the MINIMAL addressing method and standard
   extensions to encode FAX addresses into e-mail addresses, as required
   in reference [13].  The opposite problem, i.e., to allow a
   traditional numeric-only fax device user to access the e-mail
   transport service, is not discussed here.

   These IANA forms used to register the standard elements defined here
   are given in the "IANA Considerations" chapter (section 7 of this
   document).

   All implementations supporting FAX over e-mail address format MUST
   support this minimal specification.

1.1 Terminology and Syntax conventions

   In this document the formal definitions are described using ABNF
   syntax, as defined into [7].  We will also use some of the "CORE
   DEFINITIONS" defined in "APPENDIX A - CORE" of that document.  The
   exact meaning of the capitalized words

      "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
      "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", "OPTIONAL"

   is defined in reference [6].

   In this document the following new terms are also defined:

      I-fax device:
         an I-pstn device type [13] which is able to communicate either
         directly or indirectly with the traditional FAX over GSTN
         service;

      mta-I-fax:
         the Internet domain name which identifies uniquely an I-fax
         device over the Internet (see also mta-I-pstn in [13]);

      fax-email:
         the complete Internet e-mail address structure which is used to
         transport a FAX address over the Internet e-mail service (see
         also pstn-email in [13]).

2. Minimal Fax address

   The minimal fax address within e-mail has been defined for
   consistency with reference [13] and it contains two elements: the
   fax-mbox and an optional qualif-type1 element.

   More precisely the GSTN minimal address specification requires the
   use of a unique service-selector for each specific application
   (section 2 in [13]).

   The "service-selector" defined for the fax service is as follows:

      service-selector = "FAX"
   In the syntax for the fax address a qualif-type1 element has been
   defined for support of T.30/T.33 subaddresses (see section 2 of
   [13]).  The use of this element is OPTIONAL, but compliant
   implementations MUST be able to support and correctly interpret it
   when present.  Its definition is as follows:

      qualif-type1 = "/" t33-sep "=" sub-addr

   where

      t33-sep = "T33S"

      sub-addr = 1*( DIGIT )

   Thus, the minimal specification of a fax in e-mail address is:

      fax-address = fax-mbox [ "/T33S=" sub-addr ]

      fax-mbox = "FAX=" global-phone

   Notes:

      For the case of a single subaddress, only numbers are allowed in
      <sub-addr> which is consistent with T.30, T.33, and this document.
      While T.30 and T.33 use SPACE to pad its field, padding isn't
      necessary in the <sub-addr> field defined by this document.

      For the case of multiple subaddresses, T.33 specifies the "#"
      character be used to specify multiple subaddreses.  However, only
      digits are permitted in the <sub-addr> field defined by this
      document.  Refer to section 4.1 in case multiple <sub-addr> per
      per <fax-mbox> need to be specified.

   The Minimal supported syntax for global-phone (as described in
   section 2.1 of reference [13]) is:

   global-phone = "+" 1*( DIGIT / written-sep )

   written-sep = ( "-" / "." )

   Refer to section 2.1 in [13] for other important considerations about
   the global-phone element.

2.2 Some examples of a minimal "fax-address"

   Some examples of minimal fax-address follows:

      FAX=+3940226338

      FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387

      FAX=+33-1-88335215

   Note:

      the examples shown are just for illustration purposes.

3. The e-mail address of the I-fax device: mta-I-fax

   An "I-fax device" has, among its characteristics, a unique Internet
   domain name which identifies it on the Internet.  Within Internet
   mail, this is the Right Hand Side (RHS) part of the address, i.e.,
   the part on the right of the "@" sign.  For purposes of this document
   we will call this "mta-I-fax"

      mta-I-fax = domain

   For "domain" strings used in SMTP transmissions, the string MUST
   conform to the requirements of that standards <domain> specifications
   [1], [3].  For "domain" strings used in message content headers, the
   string MUST conform to the requirements of the relevant standards
   [2], [3].

   Note:

      the use of "domain names" or "domain literals" is permitted in
      addresses in both the SMTP envelope and message header fields.

4. The fax-email

   The complete structure used to transfer a minimal FAX address over
   the Internet e-mail transport system is called "fax-email".  This
   object is a an e-mail address which conforms to [2] and [3]
   "addr-spec" syntax, with structure refinements which allows the FAX
   number to be identified.

   fax-email = ["""] ["/"] fax-address ["/"] ["""] "@" mta-I-fax

   Implementors' note:

      The optional "/" characters can result from translations from
      other transport gateways (such as some X.400 gateways) which have
      included the "/" as an optional element.  Implementations MUST
      accept the optional slashes but SHOULD NOT generate them.
      Gateways are allowed to strip them off when converting to Internet
      mail addressing.  The relevant standard [2], [3] define exactly
      when the optional "quotes" characters surrounding the entire local
      part (i.e., the part on the left of the "@" character into the
      fax-email) MUST be added.

4.1 Multiple subaddresses

   There are some instances in GSTN applications where multiple
   subaddresses are used: T.33 subaddresses in fax service are one of
   these cases.  In e-mail practice a separate and unique e-mail address
   is always used for each recipient; as such, if multiple T.33
   subaddresses are present, the use of multiple "fax-email" elements is
   REQUIRED.

   Implementors' note:

      The UA MAY accept multiple subaddress elements for the same
      global-phone, but it MUST generate multiple "fax-mbox" elements
      when submitting the message to the MTA.

4.2 Some examples of minimal "fax-email"

      Some examples of minimal fax-email addresses follows:

      FAX=+3940226338@faxworld.org

      FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387@faxworld.org

      /FAX=+33-1-88335215/@faxworld.org

   Note:

      the examples shown are just for illustration purposes.

5. Conclusion

   This proposal creates a minimal standard encoding for FAX addresses
   within the global e-mail transport system.  The proposal is
   consistent with existing e-mail standards.

6. Security Considerations

   This document specifies a means by which FAX addresses can be encoded
   into e-mail addresses.  Since e-mail routing is determined by Domain
   Name System (DNS) data, a successful attack to DNS could disseminate
   tampered information, which causes e-mail messages to be diverted via
   some MTA or Gateway where the security of the software has been
   compromised.

   There are several means by which an attacker might be able to deliver
   incorrect mail routing information to a client.  These include: (a)
   compromise of a DNS server, (b) generating a counterfeit response to
   a client's DNS query, (c) returning incorrect "additional
   information" in response to an unrelated query.  Clients SHOULD
   ensure that mail routing is based only on authoritative answers.
   Once DNS Security mechanisms [5] become more widely deployed, clients
   SHOULD employ those mechanisms to verify the authenticity and
   integrity of mail routing records.

7. IANA Considerations

   The IANA registration forms for "FAX" service-selector and "T33S"
   qualif-type1 elements are defined here.  These forms update the
   previous registration forms defined in [15].

7.1 IANA Registration form for updated value of GSTN
    address service-selector "FAX"

   To: IANA@iana.org
   Subject: Registration of updated values for the GSTN address
   service-selector specifier "FAX"

   service-selector name:

      FAX

   Description of Use:

      FAX - specify that the GSTN address refers either to an
      Internet Fax device, or an onramp/offramp Fax gateway.

      For a complete description refer to RFC 3192 and RFC 3191.

   Security Considerations:

      See the Security Consideration section of RFC 3192.

   Person & email address to contact for further information:

   Claudio Allocchio
   INFN-GARR
   c/o Sincrotrone Trieste
   SS 14 Km 163.5 Basovizza
   I 34012 Trieste
   Italy
   RFC2822: Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
   X.400:   C=it;A=garr;P=garr;S=Allocchio;G=Claudio;
   Phone:   +39 040 3758523
   Fax:     +39 040 3758565

7.2 IANA Registration form for updated value of GSTN
    address qualit-type1 keyword "T33S" and value

   To: IANA@iana.org
   Subject: Registration of updated values for the GSTN address
   qualif-type1 element "T33S"

   qualif-type1 "keyword" name:

      T33S

   qualif-type1 "value" ABNF definition:

      sub-addr = 1*( DIGIT )

   Description of Use:

      T33S is used to specify the numeric only optional fax sub-address
      element described in "ITU T.33 - Facsimile routing utilizing the
      subaddress; recommendation T.33 (July, 1996)".  Further detailed
      description is available in RFC 3192.

   Use Restriction:

      The use of "T33S" is restricted to "FAX" service-selector, is it
      has no meaning outside the fax service.

   Security Considerations:

      See the Security Consideration section of RFC 3192.

   Person & email address to contact for further information:

      Claudio Allocchio
      INFN-GARR
      c/o Sincrotrone Trieste
      SS 14 Km 163.5 Basovizza
      I 34012 Trieste
      Italy
      RFC2822: Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
      X.400:   C=it;A=garr;P=garr;S=Allocchio;G=Claudio;
      Phone:   +39 040 3758523
      Fax:     +39 040 3758565

8. Changes since RFC 2304 specification

   Although there are no major or technical changes from RFC 2304
   specification, this section briefly describes where updates and
   clarifications were introduced:

   -  considering the case that telephony systems do not conform any
      more to the "single/few" Public Operator paradigm, the old
      definition "PSTN - Public Switched Telephone Network" was changed
      into the more adequate "GSTN - Global Switched Telephone Network"
      one.  However, in order to remain consistent with the previous
      specification, the ABNF variables names were not changed.

   -  section 7 "IANA Considerations" and the IANA registration forms
      for the "FAX" "service-selector" and for the "T33S" "qualif-type1"
      elements were added;

   -  an explicit list of "new terms" with explanations was added to
      section 1.1;

   -  the case when multiple T.33 subaddresses are present was described
      more explicitly in order to clarify how to handle them (section
      4.1);

   -  in section 3 the language describing "mta-I-fax" was updated to
      better describe its relationship with an Internet Mail address;

   -  in section 4., the quoting rules of the "fax-address" and their
      practical use was made explicit both in the definition of "fax-
      email" and in the Implementors' note;

   -  the Author's Address was updated;

   -  the References list was updates to substitute ITU E.164 (1991)
      with ITU E.164 (1997).

9. Author's Address

   Claudio Allocchio
   INFN-GARR
   c/o Sincrotrone Trieste
   SS 14 Km 163.5 Basovizza
   I 34012 Trieste
   Italy

   RFC2822: Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
   X.400:   C=it;A=garr;P=garr;S=Allocchio;G=Claudio;
   Phone:   +39 040 3758523
   Fax:     +39 040 3758565

10. References

   [1]  Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC 821,
        August 1982.

   [2]  Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text
        Messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982.

   [3]  Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet hosts - application and
        support", STD 3, RFC 1123, October 1989.

   [4]  Malamud, C. and M. Rose, "Principles of Operation for the
        TPC.INT Subdomain: Remote Printing -- Technical Procedures", RFC
        1528, October 1993.

   [5]  Eastlake, D. and C. Kaufman, "Domain Name System Security
        Extensions", RFC 2065, January 1997.

   [6]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [7]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
        Specifications", RFC 2234, November 1997.

   [8]  ITU F.401 - Message Handling Services: Naming and Addressing for
        Public Message Handling Service; recommendation F.401 (August
        1992).

   [9]  ITU F.423 - Message Handling Services: Intercommunication
        Between the Interpersonal Messaging Service and the Telefax
        Service; recommendation F.423 (August 1992).

   [10] ITU E.164 - The International Public Telecommunication Numbering
        Plan E.164/I.331 (May 1997).

   [11] ITU T.33 - Facsimile routing utilizing the subaddress;
        recommendation T.33 (July 1996).

   [12] ETSI I-ETS 300,380 - Universal Personal Telecommunication (UPT):
        Access Devices Dual Tone Multi Frequency (DTMF) sender for
        acoustical coupling to the microphone of a handset telephone
        (March 1995).

   [13] Allocchio, C., "Minimal GSTN address format in Internet Mail",
        RFC 3191, October 2001.

   [14] Kille, S., "MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay): Mapping
        between X.400 and RFC 822/MIME", RFC 2156, January 1998.

   [15] Allocchio, C., "GSTN address element extensions in e-mail
        services", RFC 2846, June 2000.

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMFax gateways had to invent their own way of writing a fax number in an email address, so a sender could not know which form a given gateway would accept.
MECHANISMThe document defines the fax service-selector as FAX, the fax number as an international global phone number after an equals sign, and one optional extension element, T33S, for the numeric sub-addresses that the T.33 fax routing recommendation uses.
WHAT IT DEFINESThere is one agreed way to write a fax address, with the sub-address carried in a registered extension element. The document obsoletes RFC 2304 and updates RFC 2846.

§1The Problem and the Approach

As with all Internet mail addresses, the left-hand side, the local part, of an address generated according to this specification is not to be interpreted except by the MTA that is named on the right-hand side, the domain.

Since the very first email to fax gateway objects appeared, implementors have used a number of different methods to specify a fax address as an email address. Several objectives for these methods have been identified: to enable an email user to send and receive faxes from their email interface, and to allow some kind of fax over email service transport, possibly reducing the cost of GSTN long distance transmissions, while using the existing email infrastructure.

The memo describes the minimal addressing method and the standard extensions needed to encode fax addresses into email addresses, as required by the companion GSTN address specification. The opposite problem, letting a traditional numeric-only fax device user reach the email transport service, is not discussed.

Fax-to-mail gateways each chose their own format for the number, so a sender could not be sure what a gateway would accept. This document fixes one format for fax, built on the general GSTN address rules.

What the fax format is for
  • Send and receive faxes from mailOne of the objectives is to let an email user send and receive faxes from their email interface.
  • Use the existing mail networkAnother objective is a fax over email service that reuses the existing email infrastructure, possibly reducing the cost of long distance telephone calls.
  • The I-fax deviceA device with a unique Internet domain name that identifies it on the Internet; that domain is the right-hand side of the address.
  • Not the other directionThe opposite problem, letting a traditional numeric-only fax device reach the email service, is not discussed.

§2The Minimal Fax Address

The minimal fax address within email has been defined for consistency with the GSTN minimal address specification, and it contains two elements: the fax-mbox and an optional extension element. The GSTN minimal address specification requires a unique service-selector for each specific application, and the service-selector defined for the fax service is simply the string FAX.

In the syntax for the fax address an extension element has been defined to support the T.30 and T.33 sub-addresses. The use of this element is optional, but compliant implementations must be able to support and correctly interpret it when it is present. Its definition is a slash, the T33S separator, an equals sign and the sub-address, where the separator is the string T33S and the sub-address is one or more digits. The minimal specification of a fax address in an email address is therefore a fax-mbox with an optional T33S sub-address, where the fax-mbox is the string FAX, an equals sign and a global phone number.

Two notes apply to the sub-address. For the case of a single sub-address, only numbers are allowed, which is consistent with T.30, T.33 and this document; while T.30 and T.33 use the space character to pad their field, padding is not necessary in the sub-address field defined here. For the case of multiple sub-addresses, T.33 specifies that the hash character be used, but only digits are permitted in the sub-address field defined by this document, and Section 4.1 describes how to specify more than one sub-address per fax-mbox.

The fax address is the word FAX, an equals sign and the number. If the fax has a sub-address, as used by the T.33 routing recommendation, it follows as a slash and T33S and then digits only.

The fax address syntax (RFC 3192, Section 2)
Minimal fax address
service-selector = "FAX"

qualif-type1 = "/" t33-sep "=" sub-addr

t33-sep = "T33S"

sub-addr = 1*( DIGIT )

fax-address = fax-mbox [ "/T33S=" sub-addr ]

fax-mbox = "FAX=" global-phone

§2The global-phone Element

The minimal supported syntax for global-phone, as described in the GSTN minimal address specification, is a plus sign followed by one or more digits or written separators, where a written separator is a hyphen or a dot. The companion GSTN document covers the other important considerations about the global-phone element, including that other dialing schemes must not use the leading plus sign, that the plus sign is strictly reserved for the standard global-phone syntax, and that any written separators must be ignored by conformant implementations.

The examples given for the minimal fax address are FAX=+3940226338, FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387 and FAX=+33-1-88335215. The examples are shown for illustration purposes.

The number is written in international form, with a plus sign and then digits. Hyphens and dots may be inserted and must be ignored on receipt.

The number syntax and the examples from the RFC
global-phone
global-phone = "+" 1*( DIGIT / written-sep )

written-sep = ( "-" / "." )

Examples of a minimal fax-address:

FAX=+3940226338
FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387
FAX=+33-1-88335215

§3The mta-I-fax Part of the Address

An I-fax device has, among its characteristics, a unique Internet domain name that identifies it on the Internet. Within Internet mail this is the right-hand side of the address, the part on the right of the at sign, and this document calls it the mta-I-fax, which is simply a domain.

For domain strings used in SMTP transmissions the string must conform to the requirements of the standards for domains, and for domain strings used in message content headers it must conform to the requirements of the relevant standards. The use of domain names or domain literals is permitted in addresses in both the SMTP envelope and the message header fields.

The right-hand side is the ordinary domain of the fax device or of the gateway that will place the call, with the same rules as any other email address.

§4The fax-email Structure

The complete structure used to transfer a minimal fax address over the Internet email transport system is called the fax-email. It is an email address conforming to the addr-spec syntax, with structure refinements that allow the fax number to be identified: optionally a quote character, optionally a slash, the fax-address, optionally a slash, optionally a quote character, then the at sign and the mta-I-fax.

Implementors' note: the optional slash characters can result from translations from other transport gateways, such as some X.400 gateways, which have included the slash as an optional element. Implementations must accept the optional slashes but should not generate them, and gateways are allowed to strip them off when converting to Internet mail addressing. The relevant standards define exactly when the optional quote characters surrounding the entire local part must be added.

There are some instances in GSTN applications where multiple sub-addresses are used, and T.33 sub-addresses in the fax service are one of these cases. In email practice a separate and unique email address is always used for each recipient, so if multiple T.33 sub-addresses are present, the use of multiple fax-email elements is required. Implementors' note: the user agent may accept multiple sub-address elements for the same global-phone, but it must generate multiple fax-mbox elements when submitting the message to the MTA.

The whole thing is an ordinary email address whose local part holds the fax number. Each fax sub-address needs its own email address, because one address must mean one recipient.

The whole address and the examples from the RFC
fax-email
fax-email = ["""] ["/"] fax-address ["/"] ["""] "@" mta-I-fax

Examples of minimal fax-email addresses:

FAX=+3940226338@faxworld.org

FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387@faxworld.org

/FAX=+33-1-88335215/@faxworld.org

§6Security Considerations

The document specifies a means by which fax addresses can be encoded into email addresses. Since email routing is determined by DNS data, a successful attack on DNS could disseminate tampered information, which causes email messages to be diverted via some MTA or gateway where the security of the software has been compromised.

There are several means by which an attacker might be able to deliver incorrect mail routing information to a client: compromise of a DNS server, generating a counterfeit response to a client's DNS query, and returning incorrect additional information in response to an unrelated query. Clients should ensure that mail routing is based only on authoritative answers. Once DNS security mechanisms become more widely deployed, clients should employ those mechanisms to verify the authenticity and integrity of mail routing records.

Mail goes where DNS says it goes, so an attacker who can answer DNS queries can divert a fax to a machine they control. Clients should trust only authoritative answers, and use DNS security once it is widely deployed.

How mail routing can be tampered with
  • Compromise of a DNS serverAn attacker who controls a name server can send the wrong routing information.
  • A counterfeit answerAn attacker can reply to the client's own DNS query with a false answer.
  • Incorrect additional informationAn unrelated query can carry back additional records that a client then uses.
  • What clients should doBase mail routing only on authoritative answers, and use DNS security mechanisms to verify the authenticity and integrity of mail routing records.

§7The Two IANA Registrations

The IANA registration forms for the FAX service-selector and the T33S extension element are defined in the document, and they update the previous registration forms defined in the GSTN address element extensions specification.

The FAX service-selector registration gives the name FAX and describes its use as specifying that the GSTN address refers either to an Internet fax device or to an onramp or offramp fax gateway, with a complete description in RFC 3192 and RFC 3191. The T33S registration gives the keyword name T33S, the ABNF definition of the value as one or more digits, and describes it as the numeric-only optional fax sub-address element described in the ITU T.33 recommendation on facsimile routing using the sub-address, with a further detailed description in RFC 3192. The use of T33S is restricted to the FAX service-selector, as it has no meaning outside the fax service. Both forms carry the security considerations of this document and the contact information of the author.

Two names are registered with IANA: FAX for the service, and T33S for the sub-address. T33S is restricted to fax addresses and means nothing anywhere else.

The two names registered with IANA
  • FAX, the service-selectorSays that the address refers either to an Internet fax device or to a gateway that sends or receives faxes.
  • T33S, the extension elementCarries the numeric-only optional fax sub-address described in the ITU T.33 recommendation on facsimile routing using the sub-address.
  • Restricted to faxThe use of T33S is restricted to the FAX service-selector, because it has no meaning outside the fax service.

§8Changes since RFC 2304

There are no major or technical changes from the RFC 2304 specification, and the section records where updates and clarifications were introduced. Considering the case that telephony systems no longer conform to the single or few Public Operator paradigm, the old definition PSTN, Public Switched Telephone Network, was changed into the more adequate GSTN, Global Switched Telephone Network, although the ABNF variable names were not changed for consistency with the previous specification. Section 7, the IANA considerations, and the IANA registration forms for the FAX service-selector and for the T33S extension element were added. The changes also included the addition of the fax-email syntax and examples, the clarification of the multiple sub-addresses rule, and the update of the references list.

The rules did not change. The earlier version was tidied up: the old acronym for the telephone network was replaced, the registration forms were added, and the examples and the rule for several sub-addresses were made explicit.

§9References