RFC 7218 PROPOSED STANDARD DANE · DNS · REGISTRIES

Adding Acronyms to Simplify Conversations about DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE)

Adds descriptive acronyms for the three numeric fields in TLSA records.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
April 2014
AUTHORS
O. Gudmundsson
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 6698 — DANE TLSA
TLSA FIELDS GIVEN ACRONYMS
3
PRIVATE-USE VALUE
255
ACRONYM CASE
Case-insensitive
DOI
10.17487/RFC7218

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                    O. Gudmundsson
Request for Comments: 7218                                 Shinkuro Inc.
Updates: 6698                                                 April 2014
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721


            Adding Acronyms to Simplify Conversations about
           DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE)

Abstract

   Experience has shown that people get confused when discussing the
   three numeric fields of the TLSA record.  This document specifies
   descriptive acronyms for the three numeric fields in TLSA records.
   This document updates the format of the IANA registry created by RFC
   6698.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7218.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  TLSA Certificate Usages Registry  . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  TLSA Selectors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  TLSA Matching Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Examples of Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  TLSA Records Using/Displaying the Acronyms  . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Acronym Use in a Specification Example  . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Introduction

   During discussions on how to add DNS-Based Authentication of Named
   Entities (DANE) [RFC6698] technology to new protocols and services,
   people were repeatedly confused as to what the numeric values stood
   for and even the order of the fields of a TLSA record (note that TLSA
   is not an acronym but a name).  This document updates the IANA
   registry definition for the TLSA record to add a column containing an
   acronym for each specified field, in order to reduce confusion.  This
   document does not change the DANE protocol in any way.

   It is expected that DANE parsers in applications and DNS software can
   adopt parsing the acronyms for each field.

2.  IANA Considerations

   This document applies to the "DNS-Based Authentication of Named
   Entities (DANE) Parameters" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/
   assignments/dane-parameters>.  IANA has added a column with an
   acronym to each of the sub-registries.

   [RFC6698] and this document are the referenced documents for the
   three sub-registries.

   As these acronyms are offered for human consumption, case does not
   matter; it is expected that software that parses TLSA records will
   handle upper-, mixed-, or lower-case characters as input.

2.1.  TLSA Certificate Usages Registry

   The reference for this registry has been updated to include both
   [RFC6698] and this document.

    +-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+
    | Value | Acronym  | Short Description              | Reference   |
    +-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+
    |   0   | PKIX-TA  | CA constraint                  | [RFC6698]   |
    |   1   | PKIX-EE  | Service certificate constraint | [RFC6698]   |
    |   2   | DANE-TA  | Trust anchor assertion         | [RFC6698]   |
    |   3   | DANE-EE  | Domain-issued certificate      | [RFC6698]   |
    | 4-254 |          | Unassigned                     |             |
    |  255  | PrivCert | Reserved for Private Use       | [RFC6698]   |
    +-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+

                     Table 1: TLSA Certificate Usages

2.2.  TLSA Selectors

   The reference for this registry has been updated to include both
   [RFC6698] and this document.

       +-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+
       | Value | Acronym | Short Description        | Reference   |
       +-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+
       |   0   | Cert    | Full certificate         | [RFC6698]   |
       |   1   | SPKI    | SubjectPublicKeyInfo     | [RFC6698]   |
       | 2-254 |         | Unassigned               |             |
       |  255  | PrivSel | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698]   |
       +-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+

                          Table 2: TLSA Selectors

2.3.  TLSA Matching Types

   The reference for this registry has been updated to include both
   [RFC6698] and this document.

      +-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+
      | Value | Acronym   | Short Description        | Reference   |
      +-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+
      |   0   | Full      | No hash used             | [RFC6698]   |
      |   1   | SHA2-256  | 256 bit hash by SHA2     | [RFC6234]   |
      |   2   | SHA2-512  | 512 bit hash by SHA2     | [RFC6234]   |
      | 3-254 |           | Unassigned               |             |
      |  255  | PrivMatch | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698]   |
      +-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+

                       Table 3: TLSA Matching Types

3.  Examples of Usage

   Two examples are described below.

3.1.  TLSA Records Using/Displaying the Acronyms

   _666._tcp.first.example.  TLSA PKIX-TA CERT SHA2-512 {blob}
   _666._tcp.second.example.  TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob}

3.2.  Acronym Use in a Specification Example

   Protocol FOO only allows TLSA records using PKIX-EE and DANE-EE, with
   selector SPKI, and using SHA2-512.

4.  Security Considerations

   This document only changes registry fields and does not change the
   behavior of any protocol.  The hope is to reduce confusion, which
   would lead to better specification and operations.

5.  Acknowledgements

   Scott Schmit offered really good suggestions to decrease the
   possibility of confusion.  Viktor Dukhovni provided comments from the
   expert point of view.  Jim Schaad, Wes Hardaker, and Paul Hoffman
   provided feedback during WGLC.  Dan Romascanu and Tobias Gondrom
   pointed out a few defects during the IESG last call.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [RFC6698]  Hoffman, P. and J. Schlyter, "The DNS-Based Authentication
              of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer Security (TLS)
              Protocol: TLSA", RFC 6698, August 2012.

6.2.  Informative References

   [RFC6234]  Eastlake, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
              (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234, May 2011.

Author's Address

   Olafur Gudmundsson
   Shinkuro Inc.
   4922 Fairmont Av, Suite 250
   Bethesda, MD  20814
   USA

   EMail: ogud@ogud.com

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMPeople were confused about the meaning and order of the three numeric TLSA fields.
MECHANISMIANA adds acronym columns to the TLSA certificate-usage, selector, and matching-type sub-registries.
WHY IT MATTERSThe change improves human-readable registry entries without changing DANE protocol behavior; it updates RFC 6698.

§1Replacing Confusing Numbers with Names

People discussing DANE repeatedly confused the three numeric TLSA fields and their order. This RFC updates the IANA registry format to add an acronym for each field.

The document does not change DANE behavior. It says software that parses TLSA records is expected to accept the acronyms in upper, mixed, or lower case.

The registry shows short names alongside the field numbers. This helps people discuss the fields without changing how TLSA works.

§2Acronyms for the Three Fields

The certificate-usage registry includes PKIX-TA, PKIX-EE, DANE-TA, and DANE-EE. The selector registry includes Cert and SPKI. The matching-type registry includes Full, SHA2-256, and SHA2-512.

Each registry also has a private-use value 255, named PrivCert, PrivSel, or PrivMatch as appropriate.

Each numeric field now has names that describe its setting. The names are for human use and are not case-sensitive.

§3Examples and Security

The RFC shows TLSA records written with names such as PKIX-TA CERT SHA2-512 instead of the corresponding numeric values. It also shows how a protocol specification can state which named settings it accepts.

The security section says that this document changes registry fields only and does not change protocol behavior.

Specifications can use the acronyms to make accepted TLSA settings easier to read. The protocol itself behaves the same way.

§4References