RFC 8791 PROPOSED STANDARD YANG · DATA MODELING

YANG data structures: YANG Data Structure Extensions

Two YANG extensions for defining abstract data structures that are not configuration or operational state.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
June 2020
AUTHORS
A. Bierman, M. Björklund, K. Watsen
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 8340 — YANG tree diagrams
YANG MODULE
ietf-yang-structure-ext
MODULE PREFIX
sx
MODULE REVISION
2020-06-17
EXTENSION STATEMENTS
2 (structure, augment-structure)
YANG VERSION USED
1.1
DOI
10.17487/RFC8791

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        A. Bierman
Request for Comments: 8791                                     YumaWorks
Updates: 8340                                               M. Bjorklund
Category: Standards Track                                          Cisco
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                K. Watsen
                                                         Watsen Networks
                                                               June 2020


                     YANG Data Structure Extensions

Abstract

   This document describes YANG mechanisms for defining abstract data
   structures with YANG.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8791.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction
     1.1.  Terminology
       1.1.1.  NMDA
       1.1.2.  YANG
   2.  Definitions
   3.  YANG Data Structures in YANG Tree Diagrams
   4.  YANG Data Structure Extensions Module
   5.  IANA Considerations
     5.1.  YANG Module Registry
   6.  Security Considerations
   7.  References
     7.1.  Normative References
     7.2.  Informative References
   Appendix A.  Examples
     A.1.  "structure" Example
     A.2.  "augment-structure" Example
     A.3.  XML Encoding Example
     A.4.  JSON Encoding Example
     A.5.  "structure" Example That Defines a Non-top-level Structure
   Authors' Addresses

1.  Introduction

   There is a need for standard mechanisms to allow the definition of
   abstract data that is not intended to be implemented as configuration
   or operational state.  The "yang-data" extension statement from RFC
   8040 [RFC8040] was defined for this purpose, but it is limited in its
   functionality.

   The intended use of the "yang-data" extension was to model all or
   part of a protocol message, such as the "errors" definition in the
   YANG module "ietf-restconf" [RFC8040], or the contents of a file.
   However, protocols are often layered such that the header or payload
   portions of the message can be extended by external documents.  The
   YANG statements that model a protocol need to support this
   extensibility that is already found in that protocol.

   This document defines a new YANG extension statement called
   "structure", which is similar to but more flexible than the "yang-
   data" extension from [RFC8040].  There is no assumption that a YANG
   data structure can only be used as a top-level abstraction, and it
   may also be nested within some other data structure.

   This document also defines a new YANG extension statement called
   "augment-structure", which allows abstract data structures to be
   augmented from external modules and is similar to the existing YANG
   "augment" statement.  Note that "augment" cannot be used to augment a
   YANG data structure since a YANG compiler or other tool is not
   required to understand the "structure" extension.

1.1.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

   The following term is used within this document:

   YANG data structure:  A data structure defined with the "structure"
      statement.

1.1.1.  NMDA

   The following terms are defined in the Network Management Datastore
   Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342] and are not redefined here:

   *  configuration

   *  operational state

1.1.2.  YANG

   The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are not redefined
   here:

   *  absolute-schema-nodeid

   *  container

   *  data definition statement

   *  data node

   *  leaf

   *  leaf-list

   *  list

2.  Definitions

   A YANG data structure is defined with the "structure" extension
   statement, which is defined in the YANG module "ietf-yang-structure-
   ext".  The argument to the "structure" extension statement is the
   name of the data structure.  The data structures are considered to be
   in the same identifier namespace as defined in Section 6.2.1 of
   [RFC7950].  In particular, the seventh bullet states:

   |  All leafs, leaf-lists, lists, containers, choices, rpcs, actions,
   |  notifications, anydatas, and anyxmls defined (directly or through
   |  a "uses" statement) within a parent node or at the top level of
   |  the module or its submodules share the same identifier namespace.

   This means that data structures defined with the "structure"
   statement cannot have the same name as sibling nodes from regular
   YANG data definition statements or other "structure" statements in
   the same YANG module.

   This does not mean a YANG data structure, once defined, has to be
   used as a top-level protocol message or other top-level data
   structure.

   A YANG data structure is encoded in the same way as an "anydata"
   node.  This means that the name of the structure is encoded as a
   "container", with the instantiated children encoded as child nodes to
   this node.  For example, this structure:

     module example-errors {
       ...

       sx:structure my-error {
         leaf error-number {
           type int;
         }
       }
     }

   can be encoded in JSON as:

     "example-errors:my-error": {
       "error-number": 131
     }

3.  YANG Data Structures in YANG Tree Diagrams

   A YANG data structure can be printed in a YANG tree diagram
   [RFC8340].  This document updates RFC 8340 [RFC8340] by defining two
   new sections in the tree diagram for a module:

   1.  YANG data structures, which are offset by two spaces and
       identified by the keyword "structure" followed by the name of the
       YANG data structure and a colon (":") character.

   2.  YANG data structure augmentations, which are offset by 2 spaces
       and identified by the keyword "augment-structure" followed by the
       augment target structure name and a colon (":") character.

   The new sections, including spaces conventions, appear as follows:

     structure <structure-name>:
       +--<node>
          +--<node>
          |  +--<node>
          +--<node>
     structure <structure-name>:
       +--<node>

     augment-structure <structure-name>:
       +--<node>
          +--<node>
          |  +--<node>
          +--<node>
     augment-structure <structure-name>:
       +--<node>

   Nodes in YANG data structures are printed according to the rules
   defined in Section 2.6 of [RFC8340].  The nodes in YANG data
   structures do not have any <flags>.

4.  YANG Data Structure Extensions Module

   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-yang-structure-ext@2020-06-17.yang"
   module ietf-yang-structure-ext {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structure-ext";
     prefix sx;

     organization
       "IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
     contact
       "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
        WG List:  <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>

        Author:   Andy Bierman
                  <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com>

        Author:   Martin Bjorklund
                  <mailto:mbj+ietf@4668.se>

        Author:   Kent Watsen
                  <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>";
     description
       "This module contains conceptual YANG specifications for defining
        abstract data structures.

        The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
        NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
        'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
        described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
        they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

        Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
        authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

        Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
        without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
        the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
        forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
        Relating to IETF Documents
        (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

        This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8791
        (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8791); see the RFC itself
        for full legal notices.";

     revision 2020-06-17 {
       description
         "Initial revision.";
       reference
         "RFC 8791: YANG Data Structure Extensions.";
     }

     extension structure {
       argument name {
         yin-element true;
       }
       description
         "This extension is used to specify a YANG data structure that
          represents conceptual data defined in YANG.  It is intended to
          describe hierarchical data independent of protocol context or
          specific message encoding format.  Data definition statements
          within a 'structure' extension statement specify the generic
          syntax for the specific YANG data structure, whose name is the
          argument of the 'structure' extension statement.

          Note that this extension does not define a media type.  A
          specification using this extension MUST specify the message
          encoding rules, including the content media type, if
          applicable.

          The mandatory 'name' parameter value identifies the YANG data
          structure that is being defined.

          This extension is only valid as a top-level statement, i.e.,
          given as a substatement to 'module' or 'submodule'.

          The substatements of this extension MUST follow the ABNF
          rules below, where the rules are defined in RFC 7950:

            *must-stmt
            [status-stmt]
            [description-stmt]
            [reference-stmt]
            *(typedef-stmt / grouping-stmt)
            *data-def-stmt

          A YANG data structure defined with this extension statement is
          encoded in the same way as an 'anydata' node.  This means
          that the name of the structure is encoded as a 'container',
          with the instantiated child statements encoded as child nodes
          to this node.

          The module name and namespace value for the YANG module using
          the extension statement are assigned to each of the data
          definition statements resulting from the YANG data structure.

          The XPath document element is the extension statement itself,
          such that the child nodes of the document element are
          represented by the data-def-stmt substatements within this
          extension.  This conceptual document is the context for the
          following YANG statements:

            - must-stmt
            - when-stmt
            - path-stmt
            - min-elements-stmt
            - max-elements-stmt
            - mandatory-stmt
            - unique-stmt
            - ordered-by
            - instance-identifier data type

          The following data-def-stmt substatements are constrained
          when used within a 'structure' extension statement.

            - The list-stmt is not required to have a key-stmt defined.
            - The config-stmt is ignored if present.
         ";
     }

     extension augment-structure {
       argument path {
         yin-element true;
       }
       description
         "This extension is used to specify an augmentation to a YANG
          data structure defined with the 'structure' statement.  It is
          intended to describe hierarchical data independent of protocol
          context or specific message encoding format.

          This statement has almost the same structure as the
          'augment-stmt'.  Data definition statements within this
          statement specify the semantics and generic syntax for the
          additional data to be added to the specific YANG data
          structure, identified by the 'path' argument.

          The mandatory 'path' parameter value identifies the YANG
          conceptual data node that is being augmented and is
          represented as an absolute-schema-nodeid string, where the
          first node in the absolute-schema-nodeid string identifies the
          YANG data structure to augment, and the rest of the nodes in
          the string identifies the node within the YANG structure to
          augment.

          This extension is only valid as a top-level statement, i.e.,
          given as a substatement to 'module' or 'submodule'.

          The substatements of this extension MUST follow the ABNF
          rules below, where the rules are defined in RFC 7950:

            [status-stmt]
            [description-stmt]
            [reference-stmt]
            1*(data-def-stmt / case-stmt)

          The module name and namespace value for the YANG module using
          the extension statement are assigned to instance document data
          conforming to the data definition statements within this
          extension.

          The XPath document element is the augmented extension
          statement itself, such that the child nodes of the document
          element are represented by the data-def-stmt substatements
          within the augmented 'structure' statement.

          The context node of the 'augment-structure' statement is
          derived in the same way as the 'augment' statement, as defined
          in Section 6.4.1 of [RFC7950]. This conceptual node is
          considered the context node for the following YANG statements:

            - must-stmt
            - when-stmt
            - path-stmt
            - min-elements-stmt
            - max-elements-stmt
            - mandatory-stmt
            - unique-stmt
            - ordered-by
            - instance-identifier data type

          The following data-def-stmt substatements are constrained
          when used within an 'augment-structure' extension statement.

            - The list-stmt is not required to have a key-stmt defined.
            - The config-stmt is ignored if present.

          Example:

             module foo {
                import ietf-yang-structure-ext { prefix sx; }

                sx:structure foo-data {
                  container foo-con { }
                }
             }

             module bar {
                import ietf-yang-structure-ext { prefix sx; }
                import foo { prefix foo; }

                sx:augment-structure /foo:foo-data/foo:foo-con {
                  leaf add-leaf1 { type int32; }
                  leaf add-leaf2 { type string; }
                }
             }
         ";
     }
   }
   <CODE ENDS>

5.  IANA Considerations

5.1.  YANG Module Registry

   IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within
   the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:

   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structure-ext
   Registrant Contact:  The IESG.
   XML:  N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.

   IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module
   Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" registry:

   Name:  ietf-yang-structure-ext
   Namespace:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structure-ext
   Prefix:  sx
   Reference:  RFC 8791

6.  Security Considerations

   This document defines YANG extensions that are used to define
   conceptual YANG data structures.  It does not introduce any new
   vulnerabilities beyond those specified in YANG 1.1 [RFC7950].

7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC7950]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
              RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.

   [RFC8040]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
              Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8340]  Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
              BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.

   [RFC8342]  Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
              and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
              (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.

   [W3C.REC-xml-20081126]
              Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, M., Maler, E., and
              F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth
              Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-
              xml-20081126, November 2008,
              <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126>.

7.2.  Informative References

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

Appendix A.  Examples

A.1.  "structure" Example

   This example shows a simple address book that could be stored as an
   artifact:

   module example-module {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:example:example-module";
     prefix exm;

     import ietf-yang-structure-ext {
       prefix sx;
     }

     sx:structure address-book {
       list address {
         key "last first";
         leaf last {
           type string;
           description "Last name";
         }
         leaf first {
           type string;
           description "First name";
         }
         leaf street {
           type string;
           description "Street name";
         }
         leaf city {
           type string;
           description "City name";
         }
         leaf state {
           type string;
           description "State name";
         }
       }
     }
   }

   Below is the tree diagram of this module:

   module: example-module

     structure address-book:
       +-- address* [last first]
          +-- last      string
          +-- first     string
          +-- street?   string
          +-- city?     string
          +-- state?    string

A.2.  "augment-structure" Example

   This example adds "county" and "zipcode" leafs to the address book:

   module example-module-aug {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:example:example-module-aug";
     prefix exma;

     import ietf-yang-structure-ext {
       prefix sx;
     }
     import example-module {
       prefix exm;
     }

     sx:augment-structure "/exm:address-book/exm:address" {
       leaf county {
         type string;
         description "County name";
       }
       leaf zipcode {
         type string;
         description "Postal zipcode";
       }
     }
   }

   Below is the tree diagram of this module:

   module: example-module-aug

     augment-structure /exm:address-book/exm:address:
       +-- county?    string
       +-- zipcode?   string

A.3.  XML Encoding Example

   This example shows how an address book can be encoded in XML
   [W3C.REC-xml-20081126]:

   <address-book xmlns="urn:example:example-module">
     <address>
       <last>Flintstone</last>
       <first>Fred</first>
       <street>301 Cobblestone Way</street>
       <city>Bedrock</city>
       <zipcode xmlns="urn:example:example-module-aug">70777</zipcode>
     </address>
     <address>
       <last>Root</last>
       <first>Charlie</first>
       <street>4711 Cobblestone Way</street>
       <city>Bedrock</city>
       <zipcode xmlns="urn:example:example-module-aug">70777</zipcode>
     </address>
   </address-book>

A.4.  JSON Encoding Example

   This example shows how an address book can be encoded in JSON:

   "example-module:address-book": {
     "address": [
       {
         "city": "Bedrock",
         "example-module-aug:zipcode": "70777",
         "first": "Fred",
         "last": "Flintstone",
         "street": "301 Cobblestone Way"
       },
       {
         "city": "Bedrock",
         "example-module-aug:zipcode": "70777",
         "first": "Charlie",
         "last": "Root",
         "street": "4711 Cobblestone Way"
       }
     ]
   }

A.5.  "structure" Example That Defines a Non-top-level Structure

   The following example defines a data structure with error information
   that can be included in an <error-info> element in an <rpc-error>:

   module example-error-info {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:example:example-error-info";
     prefix exei;

     import ietf-yang-structure-ext {
       prefix sx;
     }

     sx:structure my-example-error-info {
       leaf error-code {
         type uint32;
       }
     }

   }

   The example below shows how this structure can be used in an
   <rpc-error>:

   <rpc-reply message-id="101"
        xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
     <rpc-error>
       <error-type>protocol</error-type>
       <error-tag>operation-failed</error-tag>
       <error-severity>error</error-severity>
       <error-info>
         <my-example-error-info
             xmlns="urn:example:example-error-info">
           <error-code>42</error-code>
         </my-example-error-info>
       </error-info>
     </rpc-error>
   </rpc-reply>

Authors' Addresses

   Andy Bierman
   YumaWorks

   Email: andy@yumaworks.com


   Martin Bjorklund
   Cisco

   Email: mbj+ietf@4668.se


   Kent Watsen
   Watsen Networks

   Email: kent+ietf@watsen.net

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMProtocol messages and files need to be described in YANG without being configuration or state, and the older yang-data extension was limited and hard to extend.
MECHANISMThe RFC defines a structure extension to declare an abstract data structure, and an augment-structure extension to add nodes to one from another module.
WHY IT MATTERSSpecifications can model whole or nested messages and let external documents extend them, using the same tree-diagram and encoding conventions as other YANG data.

§1Why a New Structure Statement

There is a need for standard mechanisms that allow the definition of abstract data that is not intended to be implemented as configuration or operational state. The 'yang-data' extension statement from RFC 8040 was defined for this purpose, but it is limited in its functionality.

The intended use of 'yang-data' was to model all or part of a protocol message, such as the 'errors' definition in the YANG module 'ietf-restconf' in RFC 8040, or the contents of a file. However, protocols are often layered such that the header or payload portions of the message can be extended by external documents, and the YANG statements that model a protocol need to support that extensibility, which already exists in the protocol itself.

This document defines a new YANG extension statement called 'structure', which is similar to but more flexible than 'yang-data'. There is no assumption that a YANG data structure can only be used as a top-level abstraction, and it may also be nested within some other data structure. It also defines a new extension statement called 'augment-structure', which allows abstract data structures to be augmented from external modules and is similar to the existing YANG 'augment' statement. The ordinary 'augment' statement cannot be used to augment a YANG data structure, because a YANG compiler or other tool is not required to understand the 'structure' extension.

The point of the two extensions is that a data structure can be described once, in the document that owns it, and then extended by other documents without the extending document needing to change the original one.

YANG is the language network devices use to describe their settings and their state. This document adds a way to use YANG for something else: describing the shape of data that is neither, such as the contents of a protocol message.

§1.1The Term YANG Data Structure

The document introduces one term of its own. A YANG data structure is a data structure defined with the 'structure' statement.

The terms configuration and operational state come from the Network Management Datastore Architecture (RFC 8342) and are not redefined. The terms absolute-schema-nodeid, container, data definition statement, data node, leaf, leaf-list and list come from RFC 7950 and are not redefined either.

The document defines one term: a YANG data structure is data described with the new structure statement. Everything else it uses comes from the main YANG specification.

§2Defining and Encoding a Data Structure

A YANG data structure is defined with the 'structure' extension statement, which is defined in the YANG module 'ietf-yang-structure-ext'. The argument to the statement is the name of the data structure. The data structures share the same identifier namespace as the data definition statements of RFC 7950, so a data structure cannot have the same name as a sibling node from a regular data definition statement, or as another 'structure' statement, in the same module.

Defining a structure does not force it to be used as a top-level protocol message or other top-level data structure. A YANG data structure is encoded in the same way as an 'anydata' node: the name of the structure is encoded as a container, with the instantiated children encoded as child nodes of it. So a structure called my-error with a child leaf error-number of type int is encoded in JSON as an object named for the module and the structure, holding the leaf value.

Two data definition statements are constrained inside a 'structure' statement. The list statement is not required to have a key statement, and the config statement is ignored if present. The XPath document element is the extension statement itself, so the child nodes of the document element are the data definition substatements within it, and that conceptual document is the context for statements such as must, when, path, min-elements, max-elements, mandatory, unique and ordered-by, and for the instance-identifier data type.

A structure gets a name and its own set of nodes, and it shares the name space with the rest of the module so nothing can collide. When the structure appears in a document, its name behaves like a container holding the child nodes.

RULES THAT APPLY INSIDE A STRUCTURE
  • Shared namesA structure shares the identifier namespace of the module, so no sibling may have the same name.
  • EncodingThe structure is encoded the same way as an anydata node: its name becomes a container.
  • Context nodeThe XPath document element is the extension statement itself.
  • Statements that applymust, when, path, min-elements, max-elements, mandatory, unique and ordered-by, and the instance-identifier type.
  • Two exceptionsA list needs no key statement, and the config statement is ignored.

§3Printing Structures in Tree Diagrams

A YANG data structure can be printed in a YANG tree diagram. This document updates RFC 8340 by defining two new sections in the tree diagram for a module.

The first is for YANG data structures. They are offset by two spaces and identified by the keyword 'structure' followed by the name of the structure and a colon. The second is for YANG data structure augmentations, offset by two spaces and identified by the keyword 'augment-structure' followed by the augment target structure name and a colon. Nodes in the structures are printed according to the rules in Section 2.6 of RFC 8340, and they do not have any flags.

The tree diagram of the address-book example in the RFC therefore looks like this: a 'structure address-book' line, then a list of addresses keyed on last and first, with leaves for last, first, street, city and state, the last three being optional.

YANG has a usual way of drawing the shape of a module as an indented tree. The document adds two more kinds of line to that drawing, one for structures and one for the things added to a structure from another module.

TREE DIAGRAM OF THE EXAMPLE STRUCTURE (RFC 8791, APPENDIX A.1)
Tree diagram
module: example-module

  structure address-book:
    +-- address* [last first]
       +-- last      string
       +-- first     string
       +-- street?   string
       +-- city?     string
       +-- state?    string

§4The Two Extension Statements

The 'structure' extension is used to specify a YANG data structure that represents conceptual data defined in YANG. It is intended to describe hierarchical data independent of protocol context or specific message encoding format, and the data definition statements within it specify the generic syntax for that structure, whose name is the argument of the statement. The extension does not define a media type: a specification using it MUST specify the message encoding rules, including the content media type, if applicable.

The 'structure' extension is only valid as a top-level statement, given as a substatement to 'module' or 'submodule'. Its substatements MUST follow the ABNF: a must statement, optional status, description and reference statements, any number of typedef or grouping statements, and any number of data definition statements. The module name and namespace value of the module using the extension are assigned to each of the resulting data definition statements.

The 'augment-structure' extension specifies an augmentation to a YANG data structure defined with the 'structure' statement. It has almost the same structure as the 'augment' statement. The mandatory 'path' argument identifies the conceptual data node being augmented and is represented as an absolute-schema-nodeid string, where the first node identifies the YANG data structure to augment and the rest identifies the node within the structure. It is also only valid as a top-level statement. Its substatements MUST be optional status, description and reference statements, followed by one or more data definition or case statements. The same two data definition statements are constrained: a list is not required to have a key, and the config statement is ignored.

The RFC's worked example defines an address book with a list of addresses, and then a second module that adds county and zipcode leaves to it with 'augment-structure', pointing at the path of the address list inside the structure.

The first extension declares a structure and says what may go inside it. The second adds nodes to a structure that somebody else declared, by giving the path of the node to extend. Both can only appear at the top level of a module.

THE TWO EXTENSION STATEMENTS (RFC 8791, SECTION 4)
Aspectstructureaugment-structure
PurposeDefines a YANG data structureAdds data to a YANG data structure defined elsewhere
ArgumentThe name of the structureAn absolute-schema-nodeid path to the node being augmented
Where it may appearTop level of a module or submoduleTop level of a module or submodule
Substatementsmust, status, description, reference, typedef or grouping, and data definition statementsstatus, description, reference, and one or more data definition or case statements
List key requiredNoNo
EXAMPLE STRUCTURE DEFINITION (RFC 8791, APPENDIX A.1)
An address book structure
module example-module {
  yang-version 1.1;
  namespace "urn:example:example-module";
  prefix exm;

  import ietf-yang-structure-ext {
    prefix sx;
  }

  sx:structure address-book {
    list address {
      key "last first";
      leaf last {
        type string;
        description "Last name";
      }
      leaf first {
        type string;
        description "First name";
      }
      leaf street {
        type string;
        description "Street name";
      }
      leaf city {
        type string;
        description "City name";
      }
      leaf state {
        type string;
        description "State name";
      }
    }
  }
}

§5IANA Registrations

IANA has registered the URI urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structure-ext in the 'ns' subregistry of the IETF XML Registry, with the IESG as registrant contact, and the note that the requested URI is an XML namespace.

IANA has also registered the YANG module 'ietf-yang-structure-ext' in the 'YANG Module Names' subregistry of the 'YANG Parameters' registry, with the same namespace, the prefix 'sx', and RFC 8791 as the reference.

The XML namespace list and the list of YANG module names each get one new entry for this document.

§6Security Considerations

The document defines YANG extensions that are used to define conceptual YANG data structures. It does not introduce any new vulnerabilities beyond those specified in YANG 1.1 (RFC 7950).

Describing data shapes adds no risk of its own. The usual YANG security considerations still apply.

§8References